2015
DOI: 10.1080/1523908x.2015.1053111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shale We Drill? Discourse Dynamics in UK Fracking Debates

Abstract: This article examines competing political discourses surrounding shale extraction in the UK. It asks how these meanings are communicated and why certain understandings of the issue gain prominence. Drawing on discourse analysis and framing studies, the article first distinguishes two competing coalitions (pro-and antishale) and their shared narratives or 'storylines' (shale opportunity versus shale threat). Through a systematic examination of press reports, websites and public documents, it identifies opposing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
103
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An emerging literature has begun to explore how unconventional gas development via hydraulic fracturing (UGD) 1 has been framed in news media (Ashmoore et al 2016;Evensen et al 2014a;Mazur 2016;Olive 2016;Vasi et al 2015), social media (Hopke and Simis 2015;Jaspal, Turner, and Nerlich 2014) and public discourse (Bomberg 2015;Cotton et al 2014;Cotton, 2015;Hilson 2015;Kroepsch 2016;Molinatti and Simonneau 2015;Williams et al 2015). The foregoing research reveals the complex and nuanced ways in which perspectives on this issue are negotiated and emerge -supported by substantial research on public perceptions of UGD (e.g., Anderson and Theodori 2009;Boudet et al 2014;Braiser et al 2013;Clarke et al 2015;Evensen et al 2014b;Evensen 2015a;Evensen and Stedman 2016;Israel et al 2015;Malin 2014;Morrone et al 2015;Perry 2012b;Sangaramoorthy et al 2016;Schafft and Biddle 2015;Stedman et al 2012;Stedman et al 2016;Willow 2014; see Thomas et al 2017 for a review).…”
Section: Shale Gas Development Public Perceptions and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An emerging literature has begun to explore how unconventional gas development via hydraulic fracturing (UGD) 1 has been framed in news media (Ashmoore et al 2016;Evensen et al 2014a;Mazur 2016;Olive 2016;Vasi et al 2015), social media (Hopke and Simis 2015;Jaspal, Turner, and Nerlich 2014) and public discourse (Bomberg 2015;Cotton et al 2014;Cotton, 2015;Hilson 2015;Kroepsch 2016;Molinatti and Simonneau 2015;Williams et al 2015). The foregoing research reveals the complex and nuanced ways in which perspectives on this issue are negotiated and emerge -supported by substantial research on public perceptions of UGD (e.g., Anderson and Theodori 2009;Boudet et al 2014;Braiser et al 2013;Clarke et al 2015;Evensen et al 2014b;Evensen 2015a;Evensen and Stedman 2016;Israel et al 2015;Malin 2014;Morrone et al 2015;Perry 2012b;Sangaramoorthy et al 2016;Schafft and Biddle 2015;Stedman et al 2012;Stedman et al 2016;Willow 2014; see Thomas et al 2017 for a review).…”
Section: Shale Gas Development Public Perceptions and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Despite the lack of actual shale gas development, dialogue about shale gas extraction has been no less lively in the UK (e.g. [4,11,56] than in the US [14,2], Much of the conversation about shale gas development in the UK has tended to focus broadly on whether it will obtain positive or negative impacts and why (as opposed to how to manage specific aspects of development). This conversation, thus, points to whether development should or should not occur [4,25,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cotton [15] uses Q-methodology to identify specific areas of agreement and contestation. Bomberg [7] undertakes a systematic content analysis of UK media frames, assesses their potential effectiveness (or resonance), and detects a "growing dominance of more parochial frames" over broader national or global discourses regarding the economy or climate change. Hilson [39] evaluates the limited legal relevance of such global frames in England's planning and regulatory procedures.…”
Section: Context and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for reassurance has become increasingly evident in the face of determined opposition to UGD [7]. The storyline emphasises the value of public consultation to obtain the necessary 'social licence' for UGD (e.g.…”
Section: (3) Reassurancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation