2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(04)00179-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shallow bias in Mediterranean paleomagnetic directions caused by inclination error

Abstract: A variety of paleomagnetic data from the Mediterranean region show a strong bias toward shallow inclinations. This pattern of shallow inclinations has been interpreted to be the result of (1) major northward terrane displacement, (2) large nondipole components in the Earth's magnetic field, and (3) systematic inclination flattening of the paleomagnetic directions. Here, we use the observation that, in addition to the well-known variation of magnetic inclination with latitude, the N -S elongation of directional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I error has sometimes been dismissed as being not very important because of bioturbation or lack of appreciable compaction [e.g., Opdyke , 1961; Irving and Major , 1964; Irving , 1967; Kent , 1973; Van der Voo et al , 1995], as shown for many deep‐sea sediments [ Opdyke and Henry , 1969; Schneider and Kent , 1990]. Recently, however, especially in terrestrial sedimentary rocks, I error has been more widely recognized using the elongation/inclination ( E/I ) statistical method [ Tauxe and Kent , 2004] on the distribution of directions [ Krijgsman and Tauxe , 2004; Krijgsman and Tauxe , 2006] and by magnetic anisotropy measurements [ Garcés et al , 1996; Kodama , 1997; Tan and Kodama , 2002]; where they have been compared, these two methods yield consistent estimates of I error [ Kent and Tauxe , 2005; Tan et al , 2007; Tauxe et al , 2008]. Igneous rocks are not subject to I error, and where comparisons between coeval layered igneous and sedimentary rocks have been made the shallowing of sedimentary inclinations is often apparent.…”
Section: Sedimentary Bias In Jurassic and Triassic Cratonic Polesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…I error has sometimes been dismissed as being not very important because of bioturbation or lack of appreciable compaction [e.g., Opdyke , 1961; Irving and Major , 1964; Irving , 1967; Kent , 1973; Van der Voo et al , 1995], as shown for many deep‐sea sediments [ Opdyke and Henry , 1969; Schneider and Kent , 1990]. Recently, however, especially in terrestrial sedimentary rocks, I error has been more widely recognized using the elongation/inclination ( E/I ) statistical method [ Tauxe and Kent , 2004] on the distribution of directions [ Krijgsman and Tauxe , 2004; Krijgsman and Tauxe , 2006] and by magnetic anisotropy measurements [ Garcés et al , 1996; Kodama , 1997; Tan and Kodama , 2002]; where they have been compared, these two methods yield consistent estimates of I error [ Kent and Tauxe , 2005; Tan et al , 2007; Tauxe et al , 2008]. Igneous rocks are not subject to I error, and where comparisons between coeval layered igneous and sedimentary rocks have been made the shallowing of sedimentary inclinations is often apparent.…”
Section: Sedimentary Bias In Jurassic and Triassic Cratonic Polesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E/I tests on Cretaceous sedimentary rocks of the Nanaimo Group of Vancouver Island indicated either essentially no significant shallowing ( f = 0.95) in terrestrial strata, or substantial flattening ( f = 0.68) in fine‐grained marine strata [ Krijgsman and Tauxe , 2006]. In contrast, terrestrial and marine marls of Miocene age in the Mediterranean region gave consistent values of f ∼ 0.7 [ Krijgsman and Tauxe , 2004]. Much more severe shallowing ( f ∼ 0.3) has been reported in Cretaceous red beds from the Tarim Basin from modeling of magnetic anisotropy [ Gilder et al , 2003].…”
Section: Sedimentary Bias In Jurassic and Triassic Cratonic Polesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to paleomagnetic reconstructions the paleolatitude of the study region was situated~2-4°more south than today 10 million years ago, depending on the pole path chosen (Krijgsman and Tauxe, 2004;Torsvik et al, 2008;Langereis, pers. comm.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect may have severe consequences for paleomagnetic interpretations. For example, shallow paleomagnetic directions can lead to the interpretation that a rock was magnetized at lower latitudes; however, they can also be caused by anisotropy‐induced deflection of a steeper NRM, with major influence on apparent polar wander paths and paleogeographic reconstructions [ Bilardello and Kodama , ; Krijgsman and Tauxe , ; Muttoni et al ., ; Tan and Kodama , ; Vaughn et al ., ]. For this reason, some authors warn against using paleomagnetic data from anisotropic rocks [ Kirker and McClelland , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%