2021
DOI: 10.1002/cepa.1428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shallow composite floor beams – Proposal of a simplified analytical method for standard fire rating

Abstract: Shallow composite floor beams are a widely accepted solution for office, residential and other types of buildings. In most of their applications a standard fire resistance between R30 to R120 is required. Several fire tests were carried out in different laboratories over the last decades with various structural configurations, showing that this structural solution exhibits an integrated fire resistance without additional fire protection. In the frame of various programs, extensive research has been done on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the results are on the safe side, even if the numerical model presents a 12% reduction of beam fire resistance, compared with the experiment. Zanon et al [10], during a similar study, also noticed this phenomenon. The authors [10] used tests from the same experimental campaign [5] in order to validate a numerical model for SFB type slim floors.…”
Section: Numerical Model -Mechanical Analysismentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the results are on the safe side, even if the numerical model presents a 12% reduction of beam fire resistance, compared with the experiment. Zanon et al [10], during a similar study, also noticed this phenomenon. The authors [10] used tests from the same experimental campaign [5] in order to validate a numerical model for SFB type slim floors.…”
Section: Numerical Model -Mechanical Analysismentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Zanon et al [10], during a similar study, also noticed this phenomenon. The authors [10] used tests from the same experimental campaign [5] in order to validate a numerical model for SFB type slim floors.…”
Section: Numerical Model -Mechanical Analysismentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Whilst rules for evaluating the design temperatures within slimfloor beams have been published [39], their basis could not be verified by the present authors. As a consequence of this, a simple calculation method for evaluating the sagging moment resistance of slim-floor beams in fire conditions was developed, and is presented in a companion paper [40]. It is proposed that this simplified method is incorporated within EN 1994-1-2 [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%