2015
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2015.361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shallow, gravity-driven flow in a poro-elastic layer

Abstract: By combining Biot's theory of poro-elasticity with standard shallow-layer scalings, a theoretical model is developed to describe axisymmetric gravity-driven flow through a shallow deformable porous medium. Motivated in part by observations of surface uplift around CO 2 sequestration sites, the model is used to explore the injection of a dense fluid into a horizontal, deformable porous layer that is initially saturated with another, less dense, fluid. The layer lies between a rigid base and a flexible overburde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that variations in permeability do not enter at this order because Eqs. (19) and (25) together imply that ||∇p/(M/L)|| = ||(∇ · σ )/(M/L)|| ∼ . This latter scaling should also be viewed as a constraint: Imposing pressure or stress gradients of size approaching M/L will drive a deformation that violates the assumption 1, invalidating the linear theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that variations in permeability do not enter at this order because Eqs. (19) and (25) together imply that ||∇p/(M/L)|| = ||(∇ · σ )/(M/L)|| ∼ . This latter scaling should also be viewed as a constraint: Imposing pressure or stress gradients of size approaching M/L will drive a deformation that violates the assumption 1, invalidating the linear theory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As a result, replacing x with X in Eqs. (19), (21), (24), and (25) will result in a Lagrangian interpretation of the linear model that is still valid to first order in . These two models are equivalent in the limit of → 0, but they will always differ at order 2 and diverge from each other as the deformation grows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the limit of a rigid till, the till reduces to a standard incompressible porous medium. In the shallow limit, we need only consider the vertical force balance on the till, which is dominated by the vertical normal stress Σ (see, e.g., Hewitt et al (2015a)). The stress Σ can be decomposed into the isotropic fluid pore pressure p and an 'effective' network stress σ, giving Σ = p + σ (cf.…”
Section: The Tillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where M = K + 4G/3 1 is the stiffness (or, more precisely, the p-wave modulus, defined in terms of the bulk and shear moduli of the till K and G; see Hewitt et al (2015a)).…”
Section: The Tillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,[9][10][11] Surface-effect pumps include all devices making use of spontaneous capillary forces and substrate wicking to passively induce fluid flow. 12 Further, force-field pumps are usually defined as nonmechanical including electro-osmotic, 3,13 electrowetting, 14 poroelastic, 15 electrodynamic, thermocapillary and gravitydriven pumps. 1,3,16,17 Common metrics for performance comparison in microfluidic applications include: operational fluid volumes, flow rates, directionality, persistence time, flow pattern control, fluid capacity, recirculation, optical accessibility, power requirements, heat transfer, and cost of implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%