2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2007.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shallow marine and coastal eolian quartz arenites in the Neoarchean-Palaeoproterozoic Karutola Formation, Dongargarh Volcano-sedimentary succession, central India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Dongarhgarh volcanic rocks have Rb -Sr ages of 2465 + 22 and 2270 + 90 Ma (Sarkar et al 1981;Krishnamurthy et al 1988). Chakraborty & Sensarma (2008) largely dismiss the inconsistency within the Rb -Sr data and argue, on the basis of correlation with well-dated units in the Singhbhum Craton, that the Nandgoan Group was developed c. 2.5 Ga. We view all these age estimates as tentative until more precise U -Pb ages are acquired.…”
Section: Bastar Cratonmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The Dongarhgarh volcanic rocks have Rb -Sr ages of 2465 + 22 and 2270 + 90 Ma (Sarkar et al 1981;Krishnamurthy et al 1988). Chakraborty & Sensarma (2008) largely dismiss the inconsistency within the Rb -Sr data and argue, on the basis of correlation with well-dated units in the Singhbhum Craton, that the Nandgoan Group was developed c. 2.5 Ga. We view all these age estimates as tentative until more precise U -Pb ages are acquired.…”
Section: Bastar Cratonmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The Dongargarh volcanic rocks have Rb-Sr ages of 2465 ± 22 Ma and 2270 ± 90 Ma (Sarkar et al, 1981;Krishnamurthy et al, 1988). Chakraborty and Sensarma (2008) largely dismiss the inconsistency within the Rb-Sr data and argue, on the basis of correlation with well-dated units in the Singhbhum Craton, that the Nandgoan Group was developed $2.5 Ga. We view all these age estimates as tentative until more precise U-Pb ages are acquired.…”
Section: Dongargarh Supergroupmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…On the other hand, the latter shows I-type character and geochemical signatures of volcanic-arc to syncollision granite . The arenites of this formation contain adhesion structures, indicating aeolian contribution to shallow-marine deposition environment (Chakraborty & Sensarma 2008). However, there are two schools of thought regarding the tectonic setup of this granite.…”
Section: Tectonic Environment and Facies Modelsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The former shows characteristics of A-type granite with sporadic development of rapakivi texture, geochemical signatures of within-plate granite. Process-based facies analysis of this unit has led to identification of five facies: (a) inner shelf; (b) shoreface; (c) delta mouth/lower delta plain; (d) tidal flat; and (e) foreshore/backshore (Chakraborty & Sensarma 2008). Geochemical discrimination indicates that the Malanjkhand granite is an I-type (Pandit & Panigrahi 2012).…”
Section: Tectonic Environment and Facies Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%