Progress in Propulsion Physics – Volume 11 2019
DOI: 10.1051/eucass/201911529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shallow water experiments to verify a numerical analysis on an aerodynamically thrust-vectored aerospike nozzle

Abstract: Shallow water experiments are predestined for fast and inexpensive experimental examination of two-dimensional (2D) flow phenomena. In this study, the shallow water analogy is used for the verification of a previous numerical analysis of an aerodynamically thrust-vectored aerospike nozzle. Experiments in a shallow water channel were conducted, using a model of an isentropic spike with a 25 percent truncation and two secondary injection sites. A comparison of the flow phenomena, e. g., shock patterns, shows a w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both analyses confirmed the comparable flow structure with the sonic jet in cross-flow situations, characterised by the high-pressure zone upstream and the low-pressure zone downstream of the injection. A preliminary verification of the simulations was conducted through shallow water experiments, which demonstrated the existence of the high-pressure zone in a qualitative manner [19,20]. However, an adequate quantitative measurement of the flow field could not be derived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both analyses confirmed the comparable flow structure with the sonic jet in cross-flow situations, characterised by the high-pressure zone upstream and the low-pressure zone downstream of the injection. A preliminary verification of the simulations was conducted through shallow water experiments, which demonstrated the existence of the high-pressure zone in a qualitative manner [19,20]. However, an adequate quantitative measurement of the flow field could not be derived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%