2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12526-010-0066-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shallow winter and summer macrofauna in a high Arctic fjord (79° N, Spitsbergen)

Abstract: Very little is known about benthic organisms surviving strategies in extreme winter conditions in polar areas. Most of the research conducted in Arctic has been carried out during the summer from depths available to research vessels. Our study is the first one conducted in winter within a high Arctic fjord at shallow depths. The main aim was to examine the patterns of diversity and community structure of shallow macrobenthos along the depth and distance-to-glacier gradients during winter in Kongsfjorden. The r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of national and international research programmes (e.g., Swerpel & Weslawski 1989;Warwick et al 2003), better logistic infrastructure and the establishment of the Kings Bay Marine Laboratory (2005) resulted in considerable increase of research activity in Kongsfjorden. Several works containing zoobenthic species lists were published (Ambrose & Leinaas 1988;Hansen & Haugen 1989;Wlodarska-Kowalczuk et al 1998;Jørgensen & Gulliksen 2001;Lippert et al 2001;Kendall et al 2003;Weslawski et al 2003;Laudien et al 2004;Lippert 2004;Sahade et al 2004;Wessels et al 2004;Wlodarska-Kowalczuk & Pearson 2004;Bick & Arlt 2005;Kaczmarek et al 2005;McMahon et al 2006;Weslawski et al 2006;Wessels et al 2006;Carlsen et al 2007;Beuchel & Gulliksen 2008;Kedra et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of national and international research programmes (e.g., Swerpel & Weslawski 1989;Warwick et al 2003), better logistic infrastructure and the establishment of the Kings Bay Marine Laboratory (2005) resulted in considerable increase of research activity in Kongsfjorden. Several works containing zoobenthic species lists were published (Ambrose & Leinaas 1988;Hansen & Haugen 1989;Wlodarska-Kowalczuk et al 1998;Jørgensen & Gulliksen 2001;Lippert et al 2001;Kendall et al 2003;Weslawski et al 2003;Laudien et al 2004;Lippert 2004;Sahade et al 2004;Wessels et al 2004;Wlodarska-Kowalczuk & Pearson 2004;Bick & Arlt 2005;Kaczmarek et al 2005;McMahon et al 2006;Weslawski et al 2006;Wessels et al 2006;Carlsen et al 2007;Beuchel & Gulliksen 2008;Kedra et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only few studies, such as Voronkov et al (2016), have included descriptions of communities on such locations in the Arctic, whereas this has been frequently done for soft-bottom communities (e.g. Wlodarska-Kowalczuk et al 1998;Kedra et al 2011). Thus, the focus of the study by Voronkov et al (2016) was to determine a limited number of characteristic zoobenthic communities that occupy Arctic shallow subtidal habitats (0-30 m depth) on hard-bottom locations in Kongsfjorden.…”
Section: Partmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I consider this important because the current data on C. setosa provided by Chambers (2000), Blake (2006), and Doner & Blake (2006) do not fully address several characters now considered to be critical for separating different species of Chaetozone from one another. As an example, Kędra et al (2011) as part of an analysis of macrofauna from a Spitsbergen fjord, near the type-locality of C. setosa, elected to lump cirratulids, including what they believed to be C. setosa, into a general cirratulid category in their study because undescribed species were known to be present in the fauna. In addition to the eight new species of Chaetozone described in the present paper, numerous additional species are known from Europe, North and South America, Antarctica and deep-sea collections globally (Blake, unpublished; Doner, unpublished); in order to deal with these and additional taxa, it is crucial for comparative purposes to have as complete a description of the type species as possible.…”
Section: Taxonomic Account Remarks On the Lectotype And Paralectotypementioning
confidence: 99%