“…I consider this important because the current data on C. setosa provided by Chambers (2000), Blake (2006), and Doner & Blake (2006) do not fully address several characters now considered to be critical for separating different species of Chaetozone from one another. As an example, Kędra et al (2011) as part of an analysis of macrofauna from a Spitsbergen fjord, near the type-locality of C. setosa, elected to lump cirratulids, including what they believed to be C. setosa, into a general cirratulid category in their study because undescribed species were known to be present in the fauna. In addition to the eight new species of Chaetozone described in the present paper, numerous additional species are known from Europe, North and South America, Antarctica and deep-sea collections globally (Blake, unpublished; Doner, unpublished); in order to deal with these and additional taxa, it is crucial for comparative purposes to have as complete a description of the type species as possible.…”