2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-03666-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SHAMAN: a user-friendly website for metataxonomic analysis from raw reads to statistical analysis

Abstract: Background Comparing the composition of microbial communities among groups of interest (e.g., patients vs healthy individuals) is a central aspect in microbiome research. It typically involves sequencing, data processing, statistical analysis and graphical display. Such an analysis is normally obtained by using a set of different applications that require specific expertise for installation, data processing and in some cases, programming skills. Results Here, we present… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed unbiased bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing to better characterize the commensal communities and potential pathobiont carriage in the nasopharynx of controls and patients with COVID-19 ( n = 42). V3–V4 region amplicons were sequenced and analyzed using SHAMAN 27 allowing for identification of 464 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Genus-level analysis demonstrated significant ( P < 0.05) perturbations comparing healthy controls to patients with COVID-19 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We performed unbiased bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing to better characterize the commensal communities and potential pathobiont carriage in the nasopharynx of controls and patients with COVID-19 ( n = 42). V3–V4 region amplicons were sequenced and analyzed using SHAMAN 27 allowing for identification of 464 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Genus-level analysis demonstrated significant ( P < 0.05) perturbations comparing healthy controls to patients with COVID-19 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removing reads containing incorrect primer or barcode sequences and sequences with more than one ambiguous base, we recovered a total of 8,075,384 reads (192,271 reads on average) from 42 samples. The bioinformatics analysis was performed into OTUs 27 or into ASVs 28 . Briefly, amplicons were clustered into OTUs with VSEARCH (v1.4) or ASV and aligned against the SILVA database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reads with ≥98.7 and ≥94.5% homology and 0.0 e-value were considered for identification at species and genus level, respectively [31]. Data analysis was further performed by SHAMAN (http://shaman.pasteur.fr, accessed on 7 July 2021) [32]. Rarefaction curves were computed to evaluate the quality of the taxonomic diversity assessment.…”
Section: Taxonomic Assignment Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values were considered statistically significant when p <0.05. PCoA, figures, and differential microbiota analysis were performed using the Shiny Application for Metagenomic Analysis (Shaman), from Institut Pasteur de Paris ( http://shaman.pasteur.fr/ ) [ 30 ]. For the differential abundance analysis, we used the BIOM Table and the “target” File that associates each sample with its explanatory variables (see suppl data: S1 File and S3 Table ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also included the interaction between diagnosis and associated diseases in the model. We used defaults parameters, such as the “weighted non-null normalization,” which was introduced by Volant et al [ 30 ] and accounts more accurately for matrix sparsity. SHAMAN/DESeq2 yields baseMean and FoldChange (and log2FoldChange) and an adjusted p-value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%