Shaming of Tax Evaders: Empirical Evidence on Perceptions of Retributive Justice and Tax Compliance Intentions

Abstract

Although naming-and-shaming (shaming) is a commonly used tax enforcement mechanism, little is known about the efficacy of shaming tax evaders. Through two experiments, this study examines the effects of shaming tax evaders on third-party observers’ perceptions of retributive justice and tax compliance intentions, and whether the salience of persuasion of observers moderates these relationships. Based on insights from defiance theory, the message learning model, and persuasive communications, this study predicts and finds that shaming evaders increases observers’ tax compliance intentions. Furthermore, the results show that higher persuasion, which includes sanction and normative appeals, affects observers’ tax compliance intentions. This study also suggests that shaming has a positive effect on perceptions of retributive justice. Importantly, the results reveal that perceptions of retributive justice in shaming punishment mediate the effect of shaming on tax compliance intentions. The implications for theory and practice are discussed.

The Correlation Between Double Taxation Conventions, Tax Compliance, and Tax Evasion. Empirical Evidence From Oecd Countries

“…The perception of tax compliance regarded through the e-tax system is explained by tax fairness, but there are also other aspects such as tax complexity and tax knowledge that must be considered (Shafique et al, 2021). An interesting study that connects the economic aspects of tax evaders and the judicial aspects of redistributive justice has been developed by Okafor (2022). The conclusions of this research reveal some important aspects as retributive justice is influenced by shaming punishment; the effects of shaming on the intention of tax compliance are influenced by retributive justice in shaming punishment.…”

A Principles – Based Assessment of The Quality of Zimbabwe’s Direct Tax Policy for The Digital Economy

“…Other scholars have, however, suggested that there should be minimal punitive measures in a tax system to encourage tax compliance (Gberegbe & Umoren, 2017). As an alternative to levying penalties, another method that positively affects the perceptions of retributive justice is the method of naming and shaming the non-compliant taxpayers (Okafor, 2022). The study, therefore, hypothesizes that: H3: There is no association between Fairness and Zimbabwe's digital tax policy.…”

The Influence of Perceptions of Justice and Trust toward Government on Tax Compliance (Case Study on Msme Taxpayers in Surabaya)

“…This research has been conducted to show that trust in government has a positive effect on compliance (Toniarta & Merkusiwati, 2023). The study by (Okafor, 2023) also stated that high levels of trust in government enable people to pay their taxes voluntarily. Based on the description above, the author formulates the following hypothesis: H2: Trust in Government has a Positive Influence on Compliance…”

“…Public trust will grow if the government properly realizes the taxes paid. Proof needs to be made by developing infrastructure and the economy (Okafor, 2023).…”