Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Trial of Multiple Techniques to Detect Cervical Neoplasia

Belinson, Jerome L.; Qiao, You‐Lin; Pretorius, Robert G.; Zhang, W.H.; Elson, Paul; Li, L.; Pan, Qin; Fischer, C.; Lörincz, Attila T.; Zahniser, David J.

doi:10.1006/gyno.2001.6370

Cited by 287 publications

(127 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

121

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Our results have shown that random biopsies in addition to colposcopy-directed biopsy did detect a few more HSILs, although the detection rate was similar between cytological LSIL (3.1%) and cytological HSIL cases (2.4%), indicating that random biopsy in positive colposcopy was not as important as that in negative colposcopy. Our data also showed that directed colposcopic biopsy in more quadrants was associated with an increased yield of HSIL detection, a result similar to that reported by Belinson et al [15]. In their report, the sensitivity of colposcopy for detecting HSIL+ involving one quadrant was 64%, and for detecting lesions involving three or four quadrants it was 89%.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Random biopsy in colposcopy-negative quadrant is not effective in women with positive colposcopy in practice

Song

Zhao

Zhang

et al. 2015

Cancer Epidemiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 91%

Random biopsy in colposcopy-negative quadrant is not effective in women with positive colposcopy in practice

Song

Zhao

Zhang

et al. 2015

Cancer Epidemiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…16 In this study the sensitivity of both Pap ThinPrep cytology (≥ASCUS) and hrHPV testing was reported to be 100% for detection of women with cancer. This could be explained by the small number of cervical cancer in this prior report (only 12 total cases included in a population of nearly 2000 studied women).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

The sensitivity of Pap cytology and HPV testing to detect incident cervical cancer: prior testing results in 178 patients with invasive cervical cancer at a large general hospital in China

Liang

Griffith

et al. 2016

Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In these studies, the frequency of results confirmed by histopathology ranged from 62.8 to 86.6% [24,25,31,32,33]. Sensitivity ranged from 51.0 to 91.6% [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internal Quality Control for Cervical Cytopathology: Comparison of Potential False-Negatives Detected at Rapid Prescreening and at 100% Rapid Review

Tavares¹,

Souza²,

Manrique³

et al. 2014

Acta Cytologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the performance of rapid prescreening (RPS) and 100% rapid review (RR-100%) as internal quality control (IQC) methods assessed by outcome at colposcopy, histopathology and repeat cytopathology for cases with false-negative results on cervical cytopathology at routine screening (RS). Study Design: Out of 12,208 cytology smears analyzed, 900 were abnormal. Of these, 656 were identified at RS, and 244 were false-negative, with 90.2% identified at RPS and 57.4% at RR-100%. Of the 900 abnormal cases, 436 were submitted for additional testing. Results: Of the 244 women with cytopathological abnormalities identified only by the IQC methods, 114 had supplementary examinations: 35 were submitted for colposcopy, 22 for biopsy and 99 for repeat cytopathology. The sensitivity of RPS for the detection of abnormalities identified on colposcopy, histopathology and repeat cytopathology was 87.5% (95% CI 67.6-97.3), 82.4% (95% CI 56.6-96.2) and 95.7% (95% CI 85.2-99.5), respectively. The sensitivity of RR-100% was 54.2% (95% CI 32.8-74.4), 52.9% (95% CI 27.8-77.0) and 47.8% (95% CI 32.9-63.1), respectively. RPS was more sensitive than RR-100% when compared to the findings on colposcopy (p = 0.011) and repeat cytopathology (p = 0.000). When compared to colposcopy, histopathology and repeat cytopathology, the sensitivity of RS was 83.2% (95% CI 76.1-88.9), 85.7% (95% CI 78.1-91.5) and 73.3% (95% CI 66.0-79.7), respectively. Conclusion: RPS performed better than RR-100% when compared to the results of colposcopy and repeat cytopathology.

show abstract

Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Trial of Multiple Techniques to Detect Cervical Neoplasia

Cited by 287 publications

References 12 publications

Random biopsy in colposcopy-negative quadrant is not effective in women with positive colposcopy in practice

Random biopsy in colposcopy-negative quadrant is not effective in women with positive colposcopy in practice

The sensitivity of Pap cytology and HPV testing to detect incident cervical cancer: prior testing results in 178 patients with invasive cervical cancer at a large general hospital in China

Internal Quality Control for Cervical Cytopathology: Comparison of Potential False-Negatives Detected at Rapid Prescreening and at 100% Rapid Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About