2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape and diffusion tensor imaging based integrative analysis of the hippocampus and the amygdala in Alzheimer's disease

Abstract: We analyzed, in an integrative fashion, the morphometry and structural integrity of the bilateral hippocampi and amygdalas in Alzheimer's disease (AD) using T1-weighted images and diffusion tensor images (DTIs). We detected significant hippocampal and amygdalar volumetric atrophies in AD relative to healthy controls (HCs). Shape analysis revealed significant region-specific atrophies with the hippocampal atrophy mainly being concentrated on the CA1 and CA2 while the amygdalar atrophy was concentrated on the ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former relies on prior biological knowledge about the discriminating ability of certain regions, generally obtained from existing literature, whereas the latter selects features based on general data characteristics, without prior knowledge. Among the automated methods, various ranking-based methods, such as t-tests (Tang et al, 2016; Wee et al, 2013) and earson’s correlation coefficient test (Davatzikos et al, 2008; Wee et al, 2011), wrapper-based methods, a combination of ranking and wrapper-based methods, such as mRMR (Wee et al, 2013), and embedded methods, such as elastic net regression, were used in the reviewed studies, and improved the classification performance. It is feasible that variations in feature-selection methods will lead to differences in AD classification performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The former relies on prior biological knowledge about the discriminating ability of certain regions, generally obtained from existing literature, whereas the latter selects features based on general data characteristics, without prior knowledge. Among the automated methods, various ranking-based methods, such as t-tests (Tang et al, 2016; Wee et al, 2013) and earson’s correlation coefficient test (Davatzikos et al, 2008; Wee et al, 2011), wrapper-based methods, a combination of ranking and wrapper-based methods, such as mRMR (Wee et al, 2013), and embedded methods, such as elastic net regression, were used in the reviewed studies, and improved the classification performance. It is feasible that variations in feature-selection methods will lead to differences in AD classification performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In earlier studies, the regional volumetric measures, calculated from structural MRI, and FA, calculated from WM tracts, have been combined for SVM-based MCI and AD classification (Cui et al, 2012; Li et al, 2014a). Among recent studies, Tang et al used volumetric, shape, and diffusion features of the hippocampus and amygdala for AD classification (Tang et al, 2016). They used PCA and tudent’s t-test for reducing the feature set, and LDA and SVM for classification.…”
Section: Classification Framework For Alzheimer’s Disease and Itsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way to investigate how atrophy is distributed along the anterior-posterior axis of HC is to perform shape analysis of the whole HC. While this approach often shows involvement of the hippocampal body in AD (Gerardin et al, 2009 ; Lindberg et al, 2012 ; Tang et al, 2016 ), the method is limited in the sense that it does not produce volumetric data on specific subfields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative, atlas‐based analysis (ABA) using a multi‐DTI atlas and a fully automated segmentation pipeline was recently proposed to segment the whole brain into multiple parcels with high accuracy . This technique has been applied to various clinical studies; for example, in patients with Alzheimer's disease . The DTI‐based whole‐brain parcellation delivered by this pipeline also provides a great opportunity for structural connectivity analysis, where each parcel serves as a network node.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 This technique has been applied to various clinical studies; for example, in patients with Alzheimer's disease. 7,8 The DTI-based whole-brain parcellation delivered by this pipeline also provides a great opportunity for structural connectivity analysis, where each parcel serves as a network node.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%