2001
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930314.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape and sources of variations of the functional response of wildfowl: an experiment with mallards, Anas platyrhynchos

Abstract: Understanding the variations of the functional response of an organism, i.e. the predation rate in relation to prey density, is necessary to understand the interactions between the animal and its food supply. This has received little attention in dabbling ducks so we investigated experimentally the shape of the functional response of mallard feeding on poultry pellets, and assessed the influence of several factors such as the size of food items, sex or individual performance on this functional response. Indivi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if scallops are too small ( £ 8 mm SH), a functional response would not likely be observed, since crabs (>95 mm carapace width) have difficulty detecting and handling them (Barbeau and Scheibling 1994b). Effects of prey size similar to our study have also been observed when mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) consume three sizes of food pellets (Fritz et al 2001), and aquatic insects (Chaoborus americanus) four sizes of crustaceans (Daphnia pulex) (Spitze 1985). In both of these studies, predators had a type II functional response on small prey and no functional response on larger prey.…”
Section: The Functional Response Of Rock Crabssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, if scallops are too small ( £ 8 mm SH), a functional response would not likely be observed, since crabs (>95 mm carapace width) have difficulty detecting and handling them (Barbeau and Scheibling 1994b). Effects of prey size similar to our study have also been observed when mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) consume three sizes of food pellets (Fritz et al 2001), and aquatic insects (Chaoborus americanus) four sizes of crustaceans (Daphnia pulex) (Spitze 1985). In both of these studies, predators had a type II functional response on small prey and no functional response on larger prey.…”
Section: The Functional Response Of Rock Crabssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Prey size is a factor that has previously been shown to affect the functional response of predators (Spitze 1985;Eggleston 1990a;Fritz et al 2001). Although we did not directly compare the effect of prey size in our study, rock crabs showed very different responses in experiments 1 and 2, which used different sized prey.…”
Section: The Functional Response Of Rock Crabsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Karasov and Martinez del Rio (2007) also proposed that secondary metabolites, common in foods of plant origin, including many fleshy fruits, may also elevate the bird's water requirements. Other food processing and dietary constraints specifically related to a fruit-based diet, such as gut capacity and mechanical function (Kersten and Visser 1996;Karasov and McWilliams 2005) and food handling and swallowing (Fritz et al 2001;Jeschke et al 2002;Durant et al 2003), may also be affected by water intake. The effects of these mechanisms may be entwined and hard to separate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In several studies, ANOVAs with proportional mortality have been employed (Lipcius & Hines 1986, Eggleston 1990a, Sponaugle & Lawton 1990. However, high inherent variability between individuals (as in this study; see also Eggleston 1990b, Fritz et al 2001, Juliano 2001) often makes it difficult for post-hoc comparisons to locate differences. Other studies have used logistic regression of proportional mortality and prey density (Trexler et al 1988, Juliano 2001, but many data sets (such as ours) do not easily fit into this framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%