1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.38.696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape coexistence effects and quasiparticle alignment inSr81

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the geometry of the array, if the gate γ G represents one or more stretched electric quadrupole (E2) transitions, then the DCO ratios for stretched E2 transitions as well as for ∆J = 0 transitions are expected to be approximately unity, while ∆J = 1 transitions yield ratios of about 0.5 if the mixing ratio δ is small [18]. Most DCO ratios were measured by gating on stretched E2 decays, while a few others were determined by gating on known E1 transitions assuming δ = 0.…”
Section: Experimental and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the geometry of the array, if the gate γ G represents one or more stretched electric quadrupole (E2) transitions, then the DCO ratios for stretched E2 transitions as well as for ∆J = 0 transitions are expected to be approximately unity, while ∆J = 1 transitions yield ratios of about 0.5 if the mixing ratio δ is small [18]. Most DCO ratios were measured by gating on stretched E2 decays, while a few others were determined by gating on known E1 transitions assuming δ = 0.…”
Section: Experimental and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison between the decay time of the recoiling nuclei and the slowing down in a thin target with a backing foil was carried out using the simulation code fits [18], which integrates over the thickness of the target with backing and accounts for evaporation of charged particles by determining a Gaussian distribution of recoil velocities (with a width that is 10% of the kinematic mean) at the time of decay. It corrects for direct feeding from up to four known higher-lying states and side feeding from one unknown state, as well as for finite detector solid angle and resolution, and the changing (energy-dependent) reaction cross sections due to the beam slowing down through the target and backing.…”
Section: Lifetime Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in [14,15] [4] and 79Kr [17]. The * indicate that 6(E2/ M1) =0 was assumed rupole moments in the 1 qp and proton aligned 3qp bands.…”
Section: A the 7/2 + Bandmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The three negative parity Nilsson orbits [303] 5/2, [301] 3/2 and [301] 1/2 form a complete subshell in the limit of pseudo-SU (3) symmetry and should be nearly degenerate in energy [4,17]. The [30113/2 Nilsson state is predicted to lie near 400 keV [14].…”
Section: D the 3/2-bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation