2022
DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/ac3fb0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape coexistence in 76Se within the neutron–proton interacting boson model

Abstract: We have investigated the low-lying energy spectrum and electromagnetic transition strengths in even-even $^{76}$Se using the proton-neutron interacting boson model (IBM-2). The theoretical calculation for the energy levels and $E2$ and $M1$ transition strengths is in good agreement with the experimental data. Especially, the excitation energy and $E2$ transition of $0^+_2$ state, which is intimately associated with shape coexistence, can be well reproduced. The analysis on low-lying states and some key structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a proxy-SU(3) model [11][12][13] has been used for a better localization of these regions, conventionally called islands of shape coexistence [14,15]. Algebraic approaches, as the Interacting Boson Model (IBM) [16][17][18][19] and the Partial Dynamical Symmetry (PDS) [20], proved to be also appropriate tools in addressing this behavior in nuclei [21][22][23][24][25], especially in heavy mass region where the dimension of the SM configuration space is prohibitive. However, taking into account that mainly the discussion is about shapes of the lowest collective states of the same nucleus, perhaps the natural choice in the description of the shape coexistence and mixing phenomena would be the Bohr-Mottelson Model (BMM) [26], where the nucleus is considered as a liquid drop which vibrates and oscillates around spherical and deformed shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a proxy-SU(3) model [11][12][13] has been used for a better localization of these regions, conventionally called islands of shape coexistence [14,15]. Algebraic approaches, as the Interacting Boson Model (IBM) [16][17][18][19] and the Partial Dynamical Symmetry (PDS) [20], proved to be also appropriate tools in addressing this behavior in nuclei [21][22][23][24][25], especially in heavy mass region where the dimension of the SM configuration space is prohibitive. However, taking into account that mainly the discussion is about shapes of the lowest collective states of the same nucleus, perhaps the natural choice in the description of the shape coexistence and mixing phenomena would be the Bohr-Mottelson Model (BMM) [26], where the nucleus is considered as a liquid drop which vibrates and oscillates around spherical and deformed shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%