2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape-constrained multi-objective genetic programming for symbolic regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These issues, as well as a concise review of the advantages and challenges of symbolic regression, are presented by Smits and Kotanchek (2005). Recently, Haider et al (2023) continued improving symbolic regression algorithms, in particular by focusing on issues with the shape the regression functions and including prior knowledge about it.…”
Section: Forecasting Methods Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues, as well as a concise review of the advantages and challenges of symbolic regression, are presented by Smits and Kotanchek (2005). Recently, Haider et al (2023) continued improving symbolic regression algorithms, in particular by focusing on issues with the shape the regression functions and including prior knowledge about it.…”
Section: Forecasting Methods Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of other approaches exist in the literature that narrow down the equation search space of SR for analyzing scientific data. One is the shape-constrained SR [14,15], which incorporates constraints on function shape (such as partial derivatives and monotonicity) using an efficient application of integer arithmetic. Additionally, other variations of SR direct the search for unit correctness [16][17][18], conserve physical properties [17,[19][20][21], and guide using predefined forms derived from the dataset [19,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Incorporating Background Knowledge Into Srmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we impose these as 'soft' constraints, penalizing expressions for constraint violation, without outright rejecting them. References [14,15] also found soft constraints to be more effective than hard constraints. This approach (as implemented in PySR) is detailed in algorithm 1 (in SI).…”
Section: Checking Thermodynamic Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the course of the evolutionary cycle of GP, some variables will survive and have higher probability to appear in later generations, while variables with less impact will gradually disappear. To determine the most important features in the developed GP tree models, the approach will be referred to as the measurement of "relative impact" of input variables [39,40]. The relative impact on an input variable is measured according to the number of references to this variable in all generated GP models starting from the initial population until the last generation.…”
Section: -3-identification Of the Most Relevant Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%