2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape controlled interpolatory ternary subdivision

Abstract: Ternary subdivision schemes compare favorably with their binary analogues because they are able to generate limit functions with the same (or higher) smoothness but smaller support.In this work we consider the two issues of local tension control and conics reproduction in univariate interpolating ternary refinements. We show that both these features can be included in a unique interpolating 4-point subdivision method by means of non-stationary insertion rules that do not affect the improved smoothness and loca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in Section 2.3 (see Remark 2.2), if compared with the corresponding order-3 NULIFS interpolant, the limit curve of the NULI 4-point scheme turns out to be tighter to the initial data polygon (in the sense of Remark 2.2). Although there are many proposals of stationary and non-stationary subdivision schemes whose refinement equations include shape parameters [1][2][3]12,17,19,30], the authors are not aware of any existing scheme whose parameters set has a behavior comparable to the NULI 4-point scheme. In fact, so far parameters have been introduced either to control the tension of the limit curve [2,3,30], to increase its smoothness [17,19] or to reproduce salient curves [1,3,12,30].…”
Section: Application Examples and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in Section 2.3 (see Remark 2.2), if compared with the corresponding order-3 NULIFS interpolant, the limit curve of the NULI 4-point scheme turns out to be tighter to the initial data polygon (in the sense of Remark 2.2). Although there are many proposals of stationary and non-stationary subdivision schemes whose refinement equations include shape parameters [1][2][3]12,17,19,30], the authors are not aware of any existing scheme whose parameters set has a behavior comparable to the NULI 4-point scheme. In fact, so far parameters have been introduced either to control the tension of the limit curve [2,3,30], to increase its smoothness [17,19] or to reproduce salient curves [1,3,12,30].…”
Section: Application Examples and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research is continually moving toward the investigation of refinement rules able to combine desirable reproduction properties under some geometrical constraints. In particular, schemes capable of reproducing circles were proposed in Zhang (1996), Zhang and Krause (2005), Sabin and Dodgson (2004), Deng and Wang (2010), Romani (2010), and, more recently, schemes based on exponential B-splines made possible the reproduction of conic sections (Beccari et al, 2007(Beccari et al, , 2009Sunita and Shunmugaraj, 2009;Conti and Romani, 2010;Conti et al, 2011) and exponential polynomials (Dyn et al, 2008;Romani, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper, interpolatory schemes are obtained from approximating schemes and the behavior of 6-point interpolating scheme is discussed thoroughly. In the literature, non-stationary subdivision schemes have been found to be constructed using trigonometric Lagrange [7,8,10], trigonometric B-spline [11][12][13] and exponential polynomials [6,19] while no interpolatory non-stationary subdivision scheme has been found using the hyperbolic function [14,15]. In this paper, binary 6-point interpolating non-stationary subdivision scheme is constructed using the hyperbolic function which has the ability to reproduce parabolas and hyperbolas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%