1992
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90046-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
154
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
154
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Complex stimuli like faces, after all, are composed of many different local elements, which include, line orientation, curvature, and shape, all properties for which aftereffects have been described (Adams & Mamassian, 2002;Gibson & Rander, 1937;Regan & Hamstra, 1992;Suzuki, 2003;Suzuki & Cavanagh, 1998). If local adaptation to these image elements accounts for a significant portion of face aftereffects, this would significantly constrain the inferences about face space that can be derived from face adaptation studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Complex stimuli like faces, after all, are composed of many different local elements, which include, line orientation, curvature, and shape, all properties for which aftereffects have been described (Adams & Mamassian, 2002;Gibson & Rander, 1937;Regan & Hamstra, 1992;Suzuki, 2003;Suzuki & Cavanagh, 1998). If local adaptation to these image elements accounts for a significant portion of face aftereffects, this would significantly constrain the inferences about face space that can be derived from face adaptation studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Kohler and Wallach (1944) reported that a prolonged adaptation to an ellipse makes a subsequently viewed circle presented at the same location appear distorted into an ellipse perpendicular to the adapting ellipse (also see Regan & Hamstra, 1992, for a comprehensive study of aspect-ratio-based aftereffects). Hartmann (1923Hartmann ( /1955, using briefly presented stimuli, observed a similar phenomenon that is more related to the present study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first pair of stimuli whose shape interaction we chose to test consisted of a line (as the priming stimulus) and a circle (as the test stimulus); we chose these stimuli partly because of the historical use of them and partly because people are sensitive in detecting slight distortion effects on a circle (e.g., Regan & Hamstra, 1992). Kohler and Wallach (1944) reported that a prolonged adaptation to an ellipse makes a subsequently viewed circle presented at the same location appear distorted into an ellipse perpendicular to the adapting ellipse (also see Regan & Hamstra, 1992, for a comprehensive study of aspect-ratio-based aftereffects).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because rigidity assumptions are not useful in discerning the shapes of flexing cylinders and the similarity between the slopes of the psychometric curves make it unlikely that entirely separate neural processes are used for flexing than for rigid cylinders, these results suggest that percepts of rigidity may arise as a result of a more general prior assumption. Although observers were able to perform this task in a consistent manner (percent perceived deeper varied monotonically with the aspect ratio, and mean PSCs were within 20% of veridical), the sensitivity observed here is substantially lower than that for discriminating elliptical departures from circular shapes in 2D (53). Computational analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%