2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45113-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape Feature Matching for Trademark Image Retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparative evaluation experiments carried out in the ARTISAN project [6] seem to clearly indicate that component-based matching of trademark images is significantly more effective than whole-image matching. The same studies, however, have also indicated that the problem of segmentation of multi-component abstract geometric images in a perceptually significant way is still an open problem (see, e.g., Fig.…”
Section: Paper Contributionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparative evaluation experiments carried out in the ARTISAN project [6] seem to clearly indicate that component-based matching of trademark images is significantly more effective than whole-image matching. The same studies, however, have also indicated that the problem of segmentation of multi-component abstract geometric images in a perceptually significant way is still an open problem (see, e.g., Fig.…”
Section: Paper Contributionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Principles deriving from Gestalt psychology are at the basis of the ARTISAN project. The first prototype system [10] uses a combination of simple global features computed both from single image components and from families of grouped components; further versions [6] show improvements in the grouping phase, the use of multi-resolution analysis to cope with texture and noise, and the introduction of a variety of shape measures. Similar principles to ARTISAN give foundation to the work of Alwis and Austin [11], which uses perceptual relationships between local features (such as co-linearism, co-curvilinearism, parallelism, and end-point proximity) as well as features computed on closed contours of the images.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jain and Vailaya (1998) proposed the use of the edge direction histogram and improved the descriptor so that it became scale and rotation invariant. Other research includes a comparative study of several common shape-based descriptors for trademark similarity comparison (Eakins et al, 2003) and a compositional shape descriptor that combines several shape descriptors (Hong & Jiang, 2008;Wei et al, 2009).…”
Section: Existing Trademark Search Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, several approaches based on geometric-based features are proposed for TIR, including Fourier description, curvature scaled space [14], edge directions histograms [15], Triangle-Area Representation (TAR) [16], the local patterns of an image [17], etc. A comparative retrieval study between a region and a geometric-based feature found that the matching of the geometric-based feature was significantly more effective than the matching of the region-based feature [18]. There is consensus that the use of multiple region-based features or the integration of region and geometric-based features work better than any single ones, while integrating various shape descriptors is generally necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%