2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape model and spin-state analysis of PHA contact binary (85990) 1999 JV6 from combined radar and optical observations

Abstract: Context. The potentially hazardous asteroid (85990) 1999 JV6 has been a target of previously published thermal-infrared observations and optical photometry. It has been identified as a promising candidate for possible Yarkovsky-O'Keefe-Radzievskii-Paddack (YORP) effect detection. Aims. The YORP effect is a small thermal-radiation torque considered to be a key factor in spin-state evolution of small Solar System bodies. In order to detect YORP on 1999 JV6 we developed a detailed shape model and analysed the spi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five pre-2015 cases have been summarized in the review chapter by Vokrouhlický et al (2015). Since then, the YORP detection has been reported for (161989) Cacus by Ďurech et al (2018b), (101955) Bennu by Hergenrother et al (2019), (68346) 2001KZ66 by Zegmott et al (2021), and Rożek et al (2019 discussed a plausible YORP determination in the case of (85990) 1999 JV6 (though here its significance is only marginal because of a still short arclength covered by the observations). In this paper, we added a robust YORP detection for (10115) 1992 SK and argue for a weak, but very plausible YORP signal in the case of ( 1685) Toro (see also Ďurech et al 2018b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five pre-2015 cases have been summarized in the review chapter by Vokrouhlický et al (2015). Since then, the YORP detection has been reported for (161989) Cacus by Ďurech et al (2018b), (101955) Bennu by Hergenrother et al (2019), (68346) 2001KZ66 by Zegmott et al (2021), and Rożek et al (2019 discussed a plausible YORP determination in the case of (85990) 1999 JV6 (though here its significance is only marginal because of a still short arclength covered by the observations). In this paper, we added a robust YORP detection for (10115) 1992 SK and argue for a weak, but very plausible YORP signal in the case of ( 1685) Toro (see also Ďurech et al 2018b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So eventually, observations may help to set this asymmetry degree. Given this perspective, we might interpret the YORP detections achieved thus far -not counting the result of Rożek et al (2019) for (85990) 1999 JV6 -as evidence for a >10 : 1 favor in YORP making the rotation accelerated over decelerated for kilometer-sized near-Earth objects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rotational period of 2.2 h for rubble pile asteroids), leading to resurfacing (Sánchez & Scheeres 2020) and rotation disruption (Scheeres 2007;Fatka et al 2020;Veras & Scheeres 2020). YORP-induced rotational disruption is supported by the observed asteroid pairs Polishook 2014) and binary asteroids (Jacobson & Scheeres 2011;Delbo et al 2011;Jacobson et al 2013Jacobson et al , 2016, including contact-binary asteroids (Rożek et al 2019;Zegmott et al 2021) and binary comets (Agarwal et al 2020), which evolve under tidal effects and the binary YORP (BYORP) effect after the binary system is formed ( Ćuk & Burns 2005;Steinberg & Sari 2011). Further potential observational evidence is the abnormal spin distribution and the obliquity distribution of near-Earth asteroids (Vokrouhlickỳ et al 2003;Pravec et al 2008;Rozitis & Green 2013b;Lupishko & Tielieusova 2014) and main belt asteroids (Lupishko et al 2019), although a recent study points out that collisions might reproduce the observed distribution without the involvement of the YORP effect (Holsapple 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, Mitchell et al [6] used only the Gaussian law, cosine law [7,8], and a "flat law" [9], for attempts to fit radar scattering by (1) Ceres, (2) Pallas, and (4) Vesta. The cosine law remains the most used scattering law option in the shape modeling of asteroids based on radar data (e.g., [10][11][12][13]); however, the physical interpretation of the fit parameters of the cosine law is not well constrained as will be discussed further below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%