2009
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2009.2022640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape Optimal Design of a 9-pole 10-slot PMLSM for Detent Force Reduction Using Adaptive Response Surface Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not completely eliminated, which is mainly due to that the pole pitch changes from 10.00 mm to 10.03 mm and the machining error of the primary length. Thirdly, with the step-skewed auxiliary irons, the second harmonic is reduced from 1.86 N to 0.13 N. Meanwhile, the fundamental is reduced from 1.66 N to 0.57 N, which can be explained based on (18). Fig.…”
Section: Validation By Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is not completely eliminated, which is mainly due to that the pole pitch changes from 10.00 mm to 10.03 mm and the machining error of the primary length. Thirdly, with the step-skewed auxiliary irons, the second harmonic is reduced from 1.86 N to 0.13 N. Meanwhile, the fundamental is reduced from 1.66 N to 0.57 N, which can be explained based on (18). Fig.…”
Section: Validation By Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the larger skewed length will increase the axial force and reduce the reciprocating range for the LPMSM with short stroke. Meanwhile, some Analysis and Minimization of Detent End Force in Linear Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines L other methods have been investigated, such as shape optimization of the exterior teeth [18], current compensation [6], [19], and PM optimization [20], and each has both the advantages and disadvantages. For the LPMSM with short stroke, the secondary end effect is also non-negligible, while only limited literature has considered this problem [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, an optimization processor was usually coupled with a finite-element analysis (FEA) solver for the machine design optimization, which has a high computational cost. Design of experiments (DoE) [1]- [2], [7]- [12] and stochastic evolutionary methods [13]- [15] are two popular techniques employed for electric machine design optimization. DoE is a statistical method that effectively quantifies the effects of changes in design variables on machine responses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OFAT method will become impractical when more design variables are considered, because the number of experiments increases exponentially with the number of design variables. The problem can be mitigated by using advanced DoE, such as the central composite design (CCD) [8]- [11] and the Latin hypercube design (LHD) [12]. These methods have been utilized in the machine design optimization problems with up to five design variables [8]- [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation