2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.10.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape optimization on constrained single-layer sound absorber by using GA method and mathematical gradient methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first techniques are satisfactory for solving problems that are defined by a few discrete decision variables only (Laurence, 1998; Rardin, 1998) The second technique integrates the problem domain knowledge and reduces the size of the search space. However, the gradient method, one of the deterministic techniques, requires a starting point or a mathematical derivation that is calculated in advance during the optimisation process (Chang et al, 2005b). Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) belong to the group of stochastic search methods, also referred to as random search.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first techniques are satisfactory for solving problems that are defined by a few discrete decision variables only (Laurence, 1998; Rardin, 1998) The second technique integrates the problem domain knowledge and reduces the size of the search space. However, the gradient method, one of the deterministic techniques, requires a starting point or a mathematical derivation that is calculated in advance during the optimisation process (Chang et al, 2005b). Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) belong to the group of stochastic search methods, also referred to as random search.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical gradient methods EPFM IPFM and FDM need good starting points (design data) when a global optimum is searched during the optimization (Chang et al, 2005); therefore, the accuracy will be limited. Recently, the Genetic Algorithm (GA), one kind of the evolutionary algorithm used to search for the global optimum by imitating a genetic evolutionary process, has been widely applied in various fields (Chang et al, 2004;Chiu, Chang, 2008;Chiu, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the constrained problem is concerned with operation and maintenance in practical engineering work, there is a growing need to optimize acoustical performance within a fixed space [8]. To efficiently depress the broadband sound energy within an enclosed room, Chang et al [9][10][11] and Chiu [12] developed optimal shaped multilayer dissipative sound absorbers using the gradient method, the simulated annealing method, and the genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional gradient methods such as the exterior penalty function (EPFM), the interior penalty function method (IPFM) and the feasible direction method (FDM) [10] lack the ability to search candidate solutions in the wide band of the database and often fall into the local optimum. Moreover, the genetic algorithm (GA) [13,14], a method based on Darwinian evolutionary principles, becomes complicated when calculating fitness using a chromosome's crossover, mutation, and elitism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%