1996
DOI: 10.1108/02644409610152989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape optimization with the biological growth method: a parameter study

Abstract: The authors would like to express their thanks to Sage-Tübitak (Ankara), for supporting this study and permitting the use of their facilities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the ratio of the major to minor axes of the resulting ellipse is 1.976, which is extremely close to the analytical solution for infinite plate with an ellipse with the aspect ratio of 2:1. For the present case, the minimum possible uniform stress level along the boundary of an elliptical hole in an infinite plat is 67.5MPa [11]. For present results, the Von Mises stress along the design boundary is an essentially constant level with a range 68.78-69.96MPa, which is a little larger than the result in the infinite plate.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, the ratio of the major to minor axes of the resulting ellipse is 1.976, which is extremely close to the analytical solution for infinite plate with an ellipse with the aspect ratio of 2:1. For the present case, the minimum possible uniform stress level along the boundary of an elliptical hole in an infinite plat is 67.5MPa [11]. For present results, the Von Mises stress along the design boundary is an essentially constant level with a range 68.78-69.96MPa, which is a little larger than the result in the infinite plate.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…A common strategy for gradientless based approaches to achieve a constant stressed boundary is to add material where stresses are high and remove it where stresses are low [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. After that, a criterion to determine "high stress" and "low stress" should be specified clearly while using above assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17,48,49 In many structural shape optimization procedures, the parameters relate to specific design criteria 47,50 or are selected to control numerical stability. 51 However, these experimentally based or problem-specific means of defining the parameters driving the model limit its use to the conditions under which the parameters are selected. While general trends in shape alterations under defined boundary conditions are independent of the parameters used, the specific local amounts of material accretion or resorption predicted by each gradientless optimization-based shape adaptation model are parameter-specific.…”
Section: Theory Model Function and Prior Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the mathematically lax nature of this gradientless type of optimization method, the model parameters, σ ref , α , and the stopping criteria are chosen by the model developer. Often, these parameters are based on experimental observations , the specific conditions studied , or to control model stability and mesh distortion . However, this makes the model suited only for the conditions under which the parameters were selected, requiring different parameter values not only for the study of different conditions but sometimes also for different portions of the design region, as multiple orders of magnitude variations in the stress measure are typical for large design regions, such as the surfaces of long bones .…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%