Authorea
DOI: 10.22541/au.158801191.13645850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shape sensitivity analysis for electromagnetic cavities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and in this case 3 . See [35] for more details. Unfortunately, given two domains Ω and Ω, in general it is not possible to define explicitly a diffeomorphism between Ω and Ω (even if it is known a priori that the two domains are diffeomorphic).…”
Section: A Piola-type Approximation Of the Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…and in this case 3 . See [35] for more details. Unfortunately, given two domains Ω and Ω, in general it is not possible to define explicitly a diffeomorphism between Ω and Ω (even if it is known a priori that the two domains are diffeomorphic).…”
Section: A Piola-type Approximation Of the Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, s . We will only show (35), since the computations to prove (36) are similar. We will first see that…”
Section: A Piola-type Approximation Of the Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For more recent papers we refer to, e.g., [3,5,11,29,38,25]. Incidentally, we note that in [24] Lamberti and the second named author have considered the eigenvalues of problem (3) with fixed and constant permittivity ε = I 3 on a variable domain and proved a real analytic dependence upon variation of the shape of the domain. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the dependence of the eigenvalues λ j [ε] upon perturbation of ε has not yet been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%