1971
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(71)90135-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shapes of the non-unique and unique first-forbidden β-spectra of 84Rb, 74As and 124I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strongest contribution to the mass of 84 Sr stemmed from a study of the negatron decay of 84 Rb (1971Bo01 [37]), a weak decay branch (R = 3.8%) observed in addition to the main β + and channels. Booij et al produced a sample of 84 Rb by α bombardment of stable bromine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strongest contribution to the mass of 84 Sr stemmed from a study of the negatron decay of 84 Rb (1971Bo01 [37]), a weak decay branch (R = 3.8%) observed in addition to the main β + and channels. Booij et al produced a sample of 84 Rb by α bombardment of stable bromine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main observables for which experimental data are available [7,8] are the if-values for the fl-+-transitions to the 2 + states, the f~t-values for the transitions to the 0 + ground states and the shape factor for the fie-spectra (C(W,)). The expressions for these observables are:…”
Section: The Beta Decay Formalism In the Framework Of The Asymmetric mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been noted that many first-forbidden β-decay transitions, like the presently discussed one, in the mediummass A = 89 − 143 nuclei play a key role in reactor antineutrino spectra [9,10]. Only a handful of electron spectra corresponding to J + ↔ J − β transitions in this region has been measured and with a rather poor precision [11,12]. According to [9,10] the β spectra for the J + ↔ J − transitions, relevant for solving the reactor anomaly and spectral bump, deviate noticeably from the allowed shape, the deviation being approximately a linear function of the electron kinetic energy (see, e.g., Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%