2014
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.5878.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shaping the Future of Research: a perspective from junior scientists

Abstract: The landscape of scientific research and funding is in flux and affected by tight budgets, evolving models of both publishing and evaluation, and questions about training and workforce stability. As future leaders, junior scientists are uniquely poised to shape the culture and practice of science in response to these challenges. A group of postdocs in the Boston area who are invested in improving the scientific endeavor, planned a symposium held on October 2 nd and 3 rd, 2014, as a way to join the discussion a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PhD training in immunology, if designed for both future societal needs and employment options, can teach key skills applicable to a much wider and more varied range of careers than working as a Federally-funded Principal Investigator at a University or Research Institute. Interestingly, in this regard I largely agree with the major points made in a recent report from the Future of Research Symposium (F1000), held to provide junior scientists with a forum to influence discussions about the future of biomedical research in the US [4]; see Box 1 for a summary of key relevant points from the report.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…PhD training in immunology, if designed for both future societal needs and employment options, can teach key skills applicable to a much wider and more varied range of careers than working as a Federally-funded Principal Investigator at a University or Research Institute. Interestingly, in this regard I largely agree with the major points made in a recent report from the Future of Research Symposium (F1000), held to provide junior scientists with a forum to influence discussions about the future of biomedical research in the US [4]; see Box 1 for a summary of key relevant points from the report.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…Given that many students report a lack of information about non-academic career options [15] this finding suggest that better information about a variety of career pathways earlier in the PhD may be beneficial [6,32]. Workshops and information sessions are offered by many institutions [33] but may have a limited ability to truly convey what it means to work in other sectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, these workshops should be convened at the grassroots level and publish their findings. An admirable model is a very large October 2014 workshop that was organized in Boston by postdoctoral trainees whose conclusions were published in a thoughtful 17-page summary (2). We are also aware of several universitybased efforts in 2015, including major upcoming efforts at the University of Wisconsin, Duke University, and the University of Michigan (see, for example, https://research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%