2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2016274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SHARE 2012: subpixel detection and unmixing experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 shows ROC curves for detection of painted panels (green and yellow) in imagery collected as part of the SHARE 2012 campaign. 30,31 There are only a few targets, and they are spatially clumped, so they do not give a robust statistical characterization of algorithm performance. They do show, however, that these algorithms can detect real targets in real backgrounds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 shows ROC curves for detection of painted panels (green and yellow) in imagery collected as part of the SHARE 2012 campaign. 30,31 There are only a few targets, and they are spatially clumped, so they do not give a robust statistical characterization of algorithm performance. They do show, however, that these algorithms can detect real targets in real backgrounds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other novel target designs are featured in spectral unmixing datasets, using ground [18] and remote sensing [8], [19], [20] imagers. The design of the SHARE 2010 and 2012 targets developed by RIT consist of a checkerboard pattern of 2 materials.…”
Section: Review Of Other Target Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Types of these fabrics are blue felt, blue cotton, yellow felt, yellow cotton, pink felt and gold felt as explained in Ref. 7 and shown in the aerial view in Figure 1. Six of these targets are pure fabrics and their sizes are (12'×12').…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image is extracted from RIT WASP imagery collected at 1551Z with approximately 6' resolution Ref. 7 For testing purposes, first, the original ground truth spectra (OG) and the a manually chosen ground truth spectra (MCG) were compared. The OG had been obtained from a spectrometer measurement, and was provided with the dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%