2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared and distinct neural activity during anticipation and outcome of win and loss: A meta-analysis of the monetary incentive delay task

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, post-hoc analyses found that observed effects of age, and the interaction between age and MDD, did not significantly differ between reward and loss anticipation contrasts. This is broadly consistent with prior meta-analytic evidence of little or no difference between the main effects of reward and loss anticipation 6264 . Thus, the present results may instead reflect development of the neural response to outcome magnitude, or of development of cognitive control or attention to salient events, rather than development of the response to cue valence (i.e., reward vs. loss).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, post-hoc analyses found that observed effects of age, and the interaction between age and MDD, did not significantly differ between reward and loss anticipation contrasts. This is broadly consistent with prior meta-analytic evidence of little or no difference between the main effects of reward and loss anticipation 6264 . Thus, the present results may instead reflect development of the neural response to outcome magnitude, or of development of cognitive control or attention to salient events, rather than development of the response to cue valence (i.e., reward vs. loss).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For example, past meta-analyses of fMRI studies on reward anticipation (Diekhof, Kaps, Falkai, & Gruber, 2012;Knutson & Greer, 2008;Liu, Hairston, Schrier, & Fan, 2011;Oldham et al, 2018;Wilson et al, 2018) and loss/punishment processing (Dugré, Dumais, Bitar, & Potvin, 2018;Wilson et al, 2018) showed that both reliably involve the ventral striatum, amygdala, ventral tegmental area, thalamus, insula and anterior midcingulate cortex/pre-supplementary motor area. Indeed, the most recent meta-analysis found no significant differences in the recruitment of such regions between reward and loss anticipation (Chen, Chaudhary, & Li, 2022). Rather than what was previously theorized, findings from meta-analyses on positive emotional stimuli (Lindquist, Satpute, Wager, Weber, & Barrett, 2016;Mende-Siedlecki, Said, & Todorov, 2013;Stevens & Hamann, 2012) and negative emotional stimuli (Lindquist et al, 2016;Pozzi, Vijayakumar, Rakesh, & Whittle, 2021;Ran, Cao, & Chen, 2018;Stevens & Hamann, 2012;Tao, He, Lin, Liu, & Tao, 2021;Vytal & Hamann, 2010) suggest that most of these regions appear to be valence-general (Lindquist et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Over the past few years, several meta-analyses showed that two psychologically distinct constructs may rely on similar (or identical) neural maps (Chen et al, 2022;Lindquist et al, 2016). Using a data-driven method on a large number of published meta-analyses, we sought to identify common brain circuits across fMRI tasks.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Data-driven Meta-analytic Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reward delivers pleasure and drives motivated behaviors. Investigators have employed the monetary incentive delay task (MIDT) or card-guessing task to identify the neural responses to win and loss [ 12 , 13 ]. Individuals with depression relative to controls demonstrated altered reward-related activations [ 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%