2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared contexts, shared background, shared values – Homophily in Finnish parliament members’ social networks on Twitter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our participants may have wanted to believe that they have access to alternative points of view through Facebook, they may not have been aware of the ways that relatively homogeneous worldviews are represented in the ethnic/racial, political, or religious compositions of their networks. Indeed, homophily, the human tendency to seek out and be attracted to more similar others, has been shown to influence adolescents’ and adults’ social interactions and network composition online (Craig & Wright, 2012; Koiranen, Koivula, Keipi, & Saarinen, 2019; Mazur & Richards, 2011). Whether it is offline echo chambers or online filter bubbles, people in general may not recognize how identity homophily in their social environments limits their perspectives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our participants may have wanted to believe that they have access to alternative points of view through Facebook, they may not have been aware of the ways that relatively homogeneous worldviews are represented in the ethnic/racial, political, or religious compositions of their networks. Indeed, homophily, the human tendency to seek out and be attracted to more similar others, has been shown to influence adolescents’ and adults’ social interactions and network composition online (Craig & Wright, 2012; Koiranen, Koivula, Keipi, & Saarinen, 2019; Mazur & Richards, 2011). Whether it is offline echo chambers or online filter bubbles, people in general may not recognize how identity homophily in their social environments limits their perspectives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, sociologists have suggested that people tend to connect with those who share similar backgrounds, values, and views. Called homophily, this phenomenon is perceived as a powerful force in people's social lives in general (Kossinets & Watts, 2009;Lazarsfeld & Merton, 1954;McPherson et al, 2001), as well as in the formation of online networks (Boutyline & Willer, 2017;Koiranen et al, 2019). As such, it is not unusual for users to exhibit selective behavior toward the content they see and the networks they form.…”
Section: Research Background: Social Behavior In Ideologically Blended Social Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the harmful consequences of antagonistic communication, research shows that in the online context, users tend to form interest-based communities, which can increase the distance between population groups while also jeopardizing societal cohesion. According to past research, people tend to gravitate toward like-minded others in both "real life" (Lazarsfeld & Merton, 1954;McPherson, Smith-Lovin, & Cook, 2001) and digital surroundings (Gaines & Mondak, 2009;Koiranen, Koivula, Keipi, & Saarinen, 2019;Sunstein, 2001). As a consequence of this conscious or unconscious selective behavior, users may isolate themselves in the so-called echo chambers (Sunstein, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community of Inquiry has to be controlled by the government (Koiranen, Koivula, Keipi, & Saarinen, 2018). In this case, the government of the Republic of Indonesia can control the community in finding the accurate data or material in accordance with the content of the law, the nation philosophy, and the character of the Indonesian based on local wisdom.…”
Section: The Model Of Women Community In the Digital Eramentioning
confidence: 99%