Shared control for road departure prevention

Katzourakis, Diomidis I.; Alirezaei, Mohsen; Winter, Joost de; Corno, Matteo; Happee, Riender; Ghaffari, Ali; Kazemi, Reza

doi:10.1109/icsmc.2011.6083811

Cited by 26 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Two studies [48], [66] found that guidance systems supporting lane keeping resulted in more crashes with obstacles compared to a no guidance condition, when these obstacles were placed in the centre of the lane, because the guidance did not recognize these obstacles. Conversely, Brandt et al [41] showed a decrease in collisions when combining guidance and warning systems into a single haptic system.…”

Section: D) Signalmentioning

confidence: 97%

The Effect of Haptic Support Systems on Driver Performance: A Literature Survey

Petermeijer

Abbink

Mulder

et al. 2015

IEEE Trans. Haptics

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A large number of haptic driver support systems have been described in the scientific literature. However, there is little consensus regarding the design, evaluation methods, and effectiveness of these systems. This literature survey aimed to investigate: (1) what haptic systems (in terms of function, haptic signal, channel, and supported task) have been experimentally tested, (2) how these haptic systems have been evaluated, and (3) their reported effects on driver performance and behaviour. We reviewed empirical research in which participants had to drive a vehicle in a real or simulated environment, were able to control the heading and/or speed of the vehicle, and a haptic signal was provided to them. The results indicated that a clear distinction can be made between warning systems (using vibrations) and guidance systems (using continuous forces). Studies typically used reaction time measures for evaluating warning systems and vehicle-centred performance measures for evaluating guidance systems. In general, haptic warning systems reduced the reaction time of a driver compared to no warnings, although these systems may cause annoyance. Guidance systems generally improved the performance of drivers compared to non-aided driving, but these systems may suffer from after-effects. Longitudinal research is needed to investigate the transfer and retention of effects caused by haptic support systems.

show abstract

Section: D) Signalmentioning

confidence: 97%

The Effect of Haptic Support Systems on Driver Performance: A Literature Survey

Petermeijer

Abbink

Mulder

et al. 2015

IEEE Trans. Haptics

115

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to interviews after the experiment, several drivers were, in fact, frustrated by experiencing contradictory guidance. Katzourakis et al (2011) found a similar misconception for an emergency maneuver by a driver assistance system with shared control for road departure prevention.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…Many works on haptic shared control have focused on driver assistance in relatively peaceful traffic conditions, such as lane following (Griffiths & Gillespie, 2005), curve negotiation (Forsyth & MacLean, 2006;Mulder, Abbink, & Boer, 2008), voluntary lane changes (Nishimura, Wada, & Sugiyama, 2013;Tsoi, Mulder, & Abbink, 2010), and parking (Hirokawa, Uesugi, Furugori, Kitagawa, & Suzuki, 2014). Additionally, the idea of haptic shared control has been expanded and applied to emergency evasive maneuvers (Della Penna, van Paassen, Mulder, Abbink, & Mulder, 2010;Itoh, Horikome, & Inagaki, 2013), road departure prevention (Katzourakis et al, 2011), and blind-spot collision prevention, which is so-called protection (Itoh & Inagaki, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward Trustworthy Haptic Assistance System for Emergency Avoidance of Collision with Pedestrian

Itoh

Tanaka

Inagaki

2015

Journal of Human-Robot Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes a haptic assistance system that provides momentary steering wheel torque to help the driver choose the steering direction for avoiding collision with a pedestrian. The results of an experiment with a driving simulator showed that reaction time was reduced significantly when using haptic assistance and that the system was effective in enhancing appropriate selection of a steering direction in many cases. However, there were cases in which the drivers' choice was opposite to the system's proposal. In order for the system to be acceptable to drivers, the drivers' natural choice of direction should be taken into account.

show abstract

“…Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) can help a driver to perform the driving task and thus improve the road traffic safety [1], [2]. On the one side systems that only warn the driver in case of an emergency, e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Steering driver assistance system: A systematic cooperative shared control design approach

Flad

Otten

Schwab

et al. 2014

2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several publications have shown that it is beneficial to design a driver assistance system using a shared control structure. For the steering task this structure can be realized with a setup in which driver and automation can apply a torque on the steering wheel in parallel. Thereby both, driver and assistance system, interact with the vehicle and each other over the haptical channel. In the system the driver is given and cannot be changed. The question is how to design the assistance system controller as an ideal complement to the driver. In this paper a formal design concept is applied to this problem which utilizes the fact that adding a controller to the overall system has to lead to a Nash equilibrium. Remaining degrees of freedom are used to optimize the designed controller with respect to a global objective function that specifies overall system performance. We refer the concept as "cooperative shared control design". For the concept driver and vehicle are modeled as a differential game. We show systematically that this concept can be used to determine the optimal assistance system if the driver characteristics are known. Simulations prove the applicability of this concept.

show abstract

Shared control for road departure prevention

Cited by 26 publications

References 10 publications

The Effect of Haptic Support Systems on Driver Performance: A Literature Survey

The Effect of Haptic Support Systems on Driver Performance: A Literature Survey

Toward Trustworthy Haptic Assistance System for Emergency Avoidance of Collision with Pedestrian

Steering driver assistance system: A systematic cooperative shared control design approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About