Shared data modeling with UML-G

Rubart, Jessica; Dawabi, Peter

doi:10.1504/ijcat.2004.004071

Cited by 15 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In our study, we focus on task-based specification of the user interface and we do not cover the UI generation aspects. Therefore we do not consider UML-based notations, such as UML-G [24], which are best suited for software implementation and UI generation or transformation.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As pointed out in [33], task analysis is used in various steps of the development process and we focus here on the specification of a system to be then developed. In a previous study [10], we have reviewed several task-based notations, such as CTT [17], GTA [32,33], MABTA [13], CUA [21] or UML-G [24] and we have highlighted the lack of support to describe the multimodal aspects of a multi-user interface. Addressing this issue, we present a notation, named COMM, that enables the designer to specify collaborative and multimodal aspects of an interactive system.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

COMM notation for specifying collaborative and multimodal interactive systems

Jourde

Laurillau

Nigay

2010

Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-user multimodal interactive systems involve multiple users that can use multiple interaction modalities. Although multi-user multimodal systems are becoming more prevalent (especially multimodal systems involving multitouch surfaces), their design is still ad-hoc without properly keeping track of the design process. Addressing this issue of lack of design tools for multi-user multimodal systems, we present the COMM (Collaborative and MultiModal) notation and its on-line editor for specifying multi-user multimodal interactive systems. Extending the CTT notation, the salient features of the COMM notation include the concepts of interactive role and modal task as well as a refinement of the temporal operators applied to tasks using the Allen relationships. A multimodal military command post for the control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) by two operators is used to illustrate the discussion.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

COMM notation for specifying collaborative and multimodal interactive systems

Jourde

Laurillau

Nigay

2010

Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Depending on the application requirements choose an appropriate SHARING INTERFACE 3.4 that allows decoupling the SHARING MODEL 3.4 from the DISTRIBUTION SCHEME 3.4 as well as mechanisms for PERSISTENCY 3.4 and TIME-DEPENDENCY 3.4 . When specifying the SHARING MODEL 3.4 , start with the TYPE OF SHARED DATA 3.4 that determines 'what' needs to be shared and may vary according to the application requirements (Rubart and Dawabi, 2004). As a good starting point one can look at the components identified in the FUNCTIONAL DECOMPOSITION MODEL 3.3 .…”

Section: Forcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Architectural patterns for collaborative applications

Avgeriou¹,

Tandler²

2006

IJCAT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:There is currently little reuse of either design or code in the development of collaborative applications. Though there are some application frameworks for this domain, they tend to be rather inflexible in the functionality they offer. This paper seeks to provide design reuse in the form of architectural patterns that focus on low-level horizontal issues: distribution, message exchange, functional decomposition, sharing data, concurrency and synchronisation. We base these patterns on a number of well-established patterns in the domain of distributed applications, concentrating on the specific issues that are encountered in the domain of collaborative applications. We also outline the relation between these low-level architectural patterns and the high-level functionality that collaborative applications offer. By codifying this knowledge and experience in the form of patterns, we hope for a wider support of low-level architectural design to the community of collaborative applications and thus a further advance of the field.

show abstract

“…There are some proposals for conceptual modelling notations of aspects of group work. Among these notations may be mentioned: a) APM (Action Port Model) focused on modeling the workflows developed by groups [6]; b) PROCLETS that proposes a notation for interaction processes associated with managing multiple workflows [7]; c) AMENITIES, that proposes extensions of UML notation (COMO-UML) for groupware modelling with emphasis on the modelling of dynamic aspects [8]; and d) UML-G, also focuses on the modelling of groupware but with emphasis on data modelling [9], [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Proposal of Interaction Modelling Formalisms in Virtual Collaborative Work Spaces

Rodríguez¹,

García-Martínez²

2014

LNSE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The virtual collaborative workspaces allow integration of work groups in which members are not physically contiguous. There is a vast literature related to modeling of software architectures that support this type of environment. However, the existing formalisms model the interaction between actors and between system and system components. In this context, this paper proposes modeling artifacts (which supplement the existing) to describe: domain vocabulary through table category-concept-definition; interactions among actors through interaction cases, interaction group diagrams, interaction procedures and sequence diagram of group dynamics; and development by group of conceptual artifacts through diagram of development of conceptual objects. we present a proof of concept to illustrate the proposal.Index Terms-Virtual spaces, collaborative work, conceptual modeling formalisms.

show abstract

Shared data modeling with UML-G

Cited by 15 publications

References 24 publications

COMM notation for specifying collaborative and multimodal interactive systems

COMM notation for specifying collaborative and multimodal interactive systems

Architectural patterns for collaborative applications

A Proposal of Interaction Modelling Formalisms in Virtual Collaborative Work Spaces

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About