2021
DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared decision making—The cornerstone in person‐centred care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Interprofessional Shared Decision Making (IP-SDM) model broadens the perspective of shared decision making beyond the patient-practitioner dyad, and positions shared decision making to be operating at the levels of patients, health care provider teams, and the health care system [ 55 , 56 ]. Likewise, the Making Informed Decisions Individually and Together (MIND-IT) model describes the multiple-roles in shared decision making in health care systems and identifies factors and roles of patient and health care providers, and other stakeholders, that impact patient and clinician reasoning about health decisions [ 57 , 58 ]. Another framework called “Aspects of patient involvement”, relates the complexity of involvement in decision making and patient relationships with health care providers [ 59 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Interprofessional Shared Decision Making (IP-SDM) model broadens the perspective of shared decision making beyond the patient-practitioner dyad, and positions shared decision making to be operating at the levels of patients, health care provider teams, and the health care system [ 55 , 56 ]. Likewise, the Making Informed Decisions Individually and Together (MIND-IT) model describes the multiple-roles in shared decision making in health care systems and identifies factors and roles of patient and health care providers, and other stakeholders, that impact patient and clinician reasoning about health decisions [ 57 , 58 ]. Another framework called “Aspects of patient involvement”, relates the complexity of involvement in decision making and patient relationships with health care providers [ 59 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compensation to support the participation of Cochrane consumers was arranged according to CIHR guidelines [45]. The team disseminated systematic review findings following a plan developed for the systematic review protocol, with presentations [46,47], and following publication of the systematic review (November 2021) [48] with plain language reports [49][50][51], and communications to network partners. The systematic review and study within a review tasks were coordinated through the University of Ottawa and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.…”
Section: Setting Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%