2021
DOI: 10.1186/s11689-021-09359-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared developmental gait disruptions across two mouse models of neurodevelopmental disorders

Abstract: Background Motor deficits such as abnormal gait are an underappreciated yet characteristic phenotype of many neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), including Williams Syndrome (WS) and Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1). Compared to cognitive phenotypes, gait phenotypes are readily and comparably assessed in both humans and model organisms and are controlled by well-defined CNS circuits. Discovery of a common gait phenotype between NDDs might suggest shared cellular and molecular deficits and highlig… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide a quantitative description of the HYB, we supplemented the array of standard assays with gait assessment and home cage behavior. The gait of all strains was inconsistent with abnormalities seen in motor disorders ( Preisig et al, 2016 ; Rahn et al, 2021 ), yet every strain exhibited distinct gait patterns that were largely preserved upon aging. In addition, we observed apparent interstrain differences of daily conduct in the home cage, including distinct time division between sheltering, wheel running, and feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To provide a quantitative description of the HYB, we supplemented the array of standard assays with gait assessment and home cage behavior. The gait of all strains was inconsistent with abnormalities seen in motor disorders ( Preisig et al, 2016 ; Rahn et al, 2021 ), yet every strain exhibited distinct gait patterns that were largely preserved upon aging. In addition, we observed apparent interstrain differences of daily conduct in the home cage, including distinct time division between sheltering, wheel running, and feeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A second challenge is to ensure the stability of the tested phenotype under the null condition throughout the study period. In many cases, the effects of a given manipulation are studied over weeks to months ( Prevot et al, 2019 ; Namdar et al, 2020 ; Rahn et al, 2021 ). Deterioration of control phenotypic behavior could confound potential manipulation-based intergroup differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developmental gait trajectories were assessed using the DigiGait Gait Analysis System (Mouse Specifics, Inc) following our previously published methods [ 31 , 32 ]. Briefly, for all mice in cohort 2, gait metrics were assessed on P21, 24, 27, 30 at 20 cm/s and again at one time point after P60 (adulthood) at both 30 cm/s and 40 cm/s (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the animal failed to run on the belt after five attempts, it was returned to its homecage. Video processing and body length assessments were conducted as previously described [ 31 , 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since mice older than 8-month Camsap3-cKO mice were lighter than their WT littermates (Figure 4A), mice at 4 months old were selected for gait measurement. At this age, gait was fully developed (Akula et al, 2020;Rahn et al, 2021), and Camsap3-cKO mice were not significantly lighter than their WT littermates (Figure 4A). The assessed litter consisted of 6 male mice: 3 WT and 3 Camsap3-cKO.…”
Section: Camsap3-cko Mice Have Slightly Altered Gaitsmentioning
confidence: 95%