2016
DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe6030011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared flow in collective physical and sports activities and subjective well-being

Abstract: This study examines physical and sport activities as a source of shared flow or optimal shared experiences and their relationship with subjective well-being (SWB). Two studies are presented with university students (N=88 and N=285) participating in group sports and physical activities. Measures included the degree of engagement in the activity, individual and shared flow, positive emotions, and subjective well-being (SWB). The first study showed that shared flow was more intense than individual flow. In the se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likert‐type items should be developed for interactional synchrony, self‐other overlap, perceived attention towards the social environment, and perceived facilitation or hampering of the flow experience through the social environment. Additionally, already existing questionnaires to capture the classic flow elements should be included (Jackson & Marsh, 1996; Zumeta et al., 2013). Regarding self‐other overlap, the Inclusion of the Other in the Self Scale (Aron et al., 1992) is of interest as well as items to measure perceived rapport (e.g., “I experience a feeling of togetherness between the individuals”) and entitativity (e.g., “To what extent do you think the individuals understood each other?“; Lakens & Stel, 2011, p. 12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likert‐type items should be developed for interactional synchrony, self‐other overlap, perceived attention towards the social environment, and perceived facilitation or hampering of the flow experience through the social environment. Additionally, already existing questionnaires to capture the classic flow elements should be included (Jackson & Marsh, 1996; Zumeta et al., 2013). Regarding self‐other overlap, the Inclusion of the Other in the Self Scale (Aron et al., 1992) is of interest as well as items to measure perceived rapport (e.g., “I experience a feeling of togetherness between the individuals”) and entitativity (e.g., “To what extent do you think the individuals understood each other?“; Lakens & Stel, 2011, p. 12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%