Despite both theoretical and empirical linguistics suggesting otherwise, researchers using semantic and phonemic fluency tasks have uncritically assumed that there are no category- or phoneme/letter-specific effects on verbal fluency performance. We recruited 16 young adult subjects and administered two semantic (animals, trees) and two phonemic (K, M) fluency tasks. Executive functions were assessed using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). On the animal compared to the tree task, subjects produced significantly more legal words, had a significantly lower intrusion rate, significantly shorter first-response latencies and final silence periods, as well as significantly shorter between-cluster response latencies. These differences can at least partly be explained by differences in the category sizes, integrity of the categories’ borders, and efficiency of the functional connectivity between subcategories. Switching on the animal but clustering on the tree task were moderately and strongly, respectively, correlated with the WCST. On the K compared to the M task, subjects produced significantly more legal words and had significantly shorter between-cluster response times. Counterintuitively, a corpus analysis revealed there are more words starting with the ⟨m⟩ compared to ⟨k⟩ in the experimental language. Performances on the K and M tasks were very limitedly associated with the WCST. Our results have important implications for research utilizing verbal fluency, indicating that researchers should pay close attention to the types of semantic categories and phonemes/letters within neuropsychological assessments, as well as in the context of reviews and meta-analyses. In order to accomplish this adequately, further research on the specificities of different verbal fluency tasks is direly needed.