2015
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0797-14.2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shared Neural Markers of Decision Confidence and Error Detection

Abstract: Empirical evidence indicates that people can provide accurate evaluations of their own thoughts and actions by means of both error detection and confidence judgments. This study investigates the foundations of these metacognitive abilities, specifically focusing on the relationship between confidence and error judgments in human perceptual decision making. Electroencephalography studies have identified the error positivity (Pe)-an event-related component observed following incorrect choices-as a robust neural … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

35
275
6
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(345 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
35
275
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Falkenstein et al, 2000;Holroyd and Coles, 2002;Endrass et al, 2005;Overbeek et al, 2005;O'Connell et al, 2007;Vocat et al, 2008;Shalgi et al, 2009). Toward resolving this debate, recent evidence using signaldetection modeling has shown that whereas the Pe is sensitive to one's subjective criteria for a perceptual decision and confidence in the decision made, the ERN is not (Steinhauser and Yeung, 2010;Boldt and Yeung, 2015). As such, our results expand on this behavioral dissociation in two critical ways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Falkenstein et al, 2000;Holroyd and Coles, 2002;Endrass et al, 2005;Overbeek et al, 2005;O'Connell et al, 2007;Vocat et al, 2008;Shalgi et al, 2009). Toward resolving this debate, recent evidence using signaldetection modeling has shown that whereas the Pe is sensitive to one's subjective criteria for a perceptual decision and confidence in the decision made, the ERN is not (Steinhauser and Yeung, 2010;Boldt and Yeung, 2015). As such, our results expand on this behavioral dissociation in two critical ways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Hajcak and Foti, 2008;Hobson et al, 2014), but is more strongly associated with an initial, somewhat automatic or implicit monitoring of the error (e.g., Gehring et al, 1993;Falkenstein et al, 2000;Endrass et al, 2005;Overbeek et al, 2005). Some have argued that it is only a precursor to the Pe, which is believed to reflect a more overt awareness and evaluative analysis of the error (e.g., Overbeek et al, 2005;Steinhauser and Yeung, 2010;Boldt and Yeung, 2015). For instance, awareness of an error is often uniquely predicted by the Pe and task salience relates to Pe magnitude, while the ERN is triggered by both aware and unaware errors (Endrass et al, 2005;Overbeek et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No such effect was seen in low-alexithymic participants. It has been recently suggested that parietal positivity in this time range is a marker of decision confidence (Boldt & Yeung, 2015). Thus, when adopting the emotional task set, highly alexithymic participants might have been less confident of their responses, irrespective of whether or not these were correct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And indeed, confidence sometimes depends on the length of the inter-judgement interval; i.e., the amount of time between making a decision and giving a confidence rating on that decision [16]. In line with these observations, recent studies have suggested that post-decisional neural signals correlate with [18] and causally drive [19] confidence judgements.…”
Section: Biases In Post-decisional Processingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In sharp contrast to this perspective, several more recent experiments have concluded that our sense of confidence is also determined by processes that occur well after we commit to a choice [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. This observation leads to several questions: What are the consequences of such post-decisional processing of confidence?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%