Shared Physical Custody and Children’s Experience of Stress

Turunen, Jani

doi:10.1080/10502556.2017.1325648

Cited by 68 publications

(68 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…43 Quite a few studies from Sweden have documented that children and adolescents in JPC show favorable outcomes compared to those in single-or stepparent families. 61,62,176,177,180,182,[185][186][187][188] In Norway, comparatively fewer studies exist. An early study conducted in 2003 found that adolescents in JPC had lower scores of depression than their peers in single parent or stepparent families, and were quite similar to those living in a nuclear family.…”

Section: Joint Physical Custodymentioning

confidence: 99%

Divorce and Family Structure in Norway: Associations With Adolescent Mental Health

Nilsen

Breivik

Wold

et al. 2017

Journal of Divorce & Remarriage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Joint Physical Custodymentioning

confidence: 99%

Divorce and Family Structure in Norway: Associations With Adolescent Mental Health

Nilsen

Breivik

Wold

et al. 2017

Journal of Divorce & Remarriage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Finally, I recall the Turunen paper published in 2015: the data for this study were from the Surveys of Living Conditions (ULF) from 2001 to 2003, the first years when the survey was accompanied by a child supplement.…”

Section: Is Shared Parenting Preventive Of Childhood Adversities and mentioning

confidence: 99%

New approaches to divorce with children: A problem of public health

Vezzetti

2016

Health Psychology Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This broad review elaborates on the most up-to-date knowledge on biochemical and psychobiological aspects of parental loss and other childhood adversities during divorce involving minor children. So far, divorce involving minor children was unfortunately considered by authorities only as a purely juridical problem, and this approach has often allowed a completely different approach according to the Courts. Now, scientific research, also making use of animal models, is demonstrating the biological basis of the problem and the indisputable consequences on the well-being and health of children. The innovative conclusion of this review is that this argument (because of its frequency and gravity) is primarily a question of public health and that it is necessary to further harmonize practices in this area.

show abstract

“…One of the most prevalent trends in current family life is that children to an increasing extent move between two households, with varying family compositions. Yet, current knowledge is almost entirely based on information from only one of these households, or on shared living arrangements without including composition of the dual set of involved households (e.g., Fransson et al 2016;Turunen 2017; see Baude, Pearson and Drapeau 2016 for a recent review). Thus, how this family complexity, and how interactions between dual, and simultaneous, family types, relate to children's wellbeing remains understudied.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Divorce Dual-Household Living Arrangements and Adolescent Wellbeing

Fallesen

Gähler

2020

European Studies of Population

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adolescents are increasingly living in two households, alternating between family contexts. It is timely to consider how these contexts may affect adolescent's psychological wellbeing. We use data from the Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Survey in Four European Countries (CILS4EU), England, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden, including data on occurrence and extent of dualhousehold residency, to correlate 15 family types with adolescent's internalizing problems, self-esteem, and life satisfaction. Analyses show that (i) adolescents in intact families exhibit better wellbeing than peers in different types of dissolved families, (ii) adolescents in reconstituted families exhibit less wellbeing than adolescents living with a single parent only, (iii) living in two households, where both parents are single or either of them is repartnered, is not associated with better wellbeing than living with a single parent only, (iv) adolescents in alternate living generally seem to do as well as their peers in intact families, but (v) there is a tendency that alternate living in a symmetrical family context, i.e., where both parents are either single or living with a new partner, is more positive for the adolescent than if one parent is in a new relationship and the other is not.

show abstract

Shared Physical Custody and Children’s Experience of Stress

Cited by 68 publications

References 56 publications

Divorce and Family Structure in Norway: Associations With Adolescent Mental Health

Divorce and Family Structure in Norway: Associations With Adolescent Mental Health

New approaches to divorce with children: A problem of public health

Post-Divorce Dual-Household Living Arrangements and Adolescent Wellbeing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About