Shared-Regulation and Motivation of Collaborating Peers: A Case Analysis

Abstract

Little attention has yet been focused on the social nature of metacognition and motivation in adult-or peer-mediated learning, although reciprocal or transactive interaction between individuals is emphasized as a road to learning, that is, in teaching and mediation of knowledge and skills. The present article presents a case analysis and focuses on (a) exploring if and how socially shared-regulation and (b) motivation and coping are manifested in high-ability, 4th grade students' peermediated learning in a technology-based game environment, specifically constructed to foster problem solving in mathematics. The case analysis supported the notion that peer-mediated learning can produce high-level learning and, also, transfer of learning. The key conditions for effective collaboration, task-orientation, and social and cognitive competencies, were met in the case of the peers. The analysis further suggested that the notion of shared-regulation could be helpful in understanding of multilevel interaction and regulatory activities in learning. The concept of sharedregulation best seemed to mirror egalitarian, complementary monitoring and regulation over the task, thus bringing the research closer to phenomena relevant to joint, peer-mediated learning. It seemed that regulation in true collaboration fluctuates among the three modes of regulation, self-, other-, and shared-regulation. We concluded, however, that collaborating peers do not regularly meet these ideal conditions, and that the more complete picture of joint problem solving and regulation is complex and variable. Understanding of these multilevel regulatory activities in learning, and their relationship to other, multilevel concepts like motivation, social competence, context, and learning, is a challenge for future research.Key words: shared-regulation, motivation, peer-mediated learning, elementary school, high-ability, word problems, learning game, technology-based learningThe literature on motivation and metacognition is still strongly focused on individuals' behavior and learning. Thus the prefix self is often added to concepts that mirror these key phenomena like self-regulation. Although the learning and volitional processes are, predominantly, described at individual level, reciprocal or transactive interaction between individuals is emphasized as a road to learning, that is, in teaching and mediation of knowledge and skills. This emphasis is generally clear in current notions on learning stemming from cognitive-constructivist theories, and it is the explicit basis of socio-constructivist views. Little attention has yet been focused on the social nature of VAURAS, IISKALA, KAJAMIES, KINNUNEN, & LEHTINEN 20metacognition and motivation in adult-or peer-mediated learning. The notion of shared cognition has been introduced (e.g., Salomon, 1993), but, we can ask, whether such terms as shared-regulation, or even shared metacognition, would highlight the control or executive processes (e.g., Perkins, 1993) involved in transactive peer learning. Although the...

Regulation of emotions in socially challenging learning situations: an instrument to measure the adaptive and social nature of the regulation process

“…Finally, Socially shared regulation, a term coined by Vauras, Iiskala, et al, (2003) represents a special case of co-regulation, where several individuals regulate their collective activity in a genuinely shared way (Hadwin et al, 2010). This form of social regulation is also consistent with the situative learning perspective, inspired by Greeno (2006), focusing on the group as the unit of analysis (Nolen & Ward, 2008).…”

Co-regulation and knowledge construction in an online synchronous problem based learning setting

“…Learners provide each other with opportunities to understand each others' perspectives which can lead to the co-construction of knowledge for better regulating learning processes. Furthermore, students in collaborative learning environments may engage in higher levels of cognitive activity (Ramsden 2003;Vauras et al 2003). Group interaction requires asking questions and providing detailed explanations that lead to higher levels of cognitive processes (King 2002).…”

Expanding Learning Presence to Account for the Direction of Regulative Intent: Self-, Co- and Shared Regulation in Online Learning

“…Shared regulation is another term used in the literature to account for the social aspects in the regulation of learning (Iiskala, Vauras, & Lehtinen, 2004;Vauras, Iiskala, Kajamies, Kinnunen, & Lehtinen, 2003). Unlike co-regulation, which includes asymmetrical scaffolding, shared regulation refers to "a symmetrical style of communication" wherein regulation is directed toward "some shared understanding or strategic decision within the group" (Grau & Whitebread, 2012, p.5).…”