2011
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharing, Discounting, and Selfishness: A Japanese-American Comparison

Abstract: Social discounting rates were compared between Japanese and American college students. In a series of psychophysical questionnaire tasks, participants chose between a hypothetical unshared monetary reward and a hypothetical monetary reward to be shared with other people (relatives or strangers), to determine amounts of the unshared reward subjectively equivalent to the shared reward. The participants also chose between sharing and not-sharing options in a one-shot dilemma game. Discount rates estimated by a hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting additional analysis looks at altruism in the sense of asking the following: while the sharing of a reward with other people, as compared to keeping it to oneself, decreases the value of that reward, to what extent is the value of the reward discounted as the number of people with whom it is shared gradually increases? (Ito and Saeki, [8]; Ito, Saeki and Green, [9]). If we explain interpersonal discounting by once again using formula (1), D is the measure that indicates the degree of closeness and k is the individual parameter indicating altruism.…”
Section: Overview Of Interpersonal Discounting Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting additional analysis looks at altruism in the sense of asking the following: while the sharing of a reward with other people, as compared to keeping it to oneself, decreases the value of that reward, to what extent is the value of the reward discounted as the number of people with whom it is shared gradually increases? (Ito and Saeki, [8]; Ito, Saeki and Green, [9]). If we explain interpersonal discounting by once again using formula (1), D is the measure that indicates the degree of closeness and k is the individual parameter indicating altruism.…”
Section: Overview Of Interpersonal Discounting Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size: The experiments can be described as relatively small, with the number of subjects ranging from 27 to 1,049 (Ito, Saeki & Green, 2011). Sixty-five percent of studies (17/26) comprised samples of approximately 200 or fewer subjects.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other countries where studies have been conducted include China (Boyer, Lienard & Xu, 2012;He & Jiang, 2013;Strombach et al, 2014), Germany (Böckler, Tusche & Singer, 2016;Strombach et al, 2014Strombach et al, /2015Strombach et al, /2016, Japan (Ito et al, 2011), Kenya (Boyer et al, 2012) and Poland (Osínski, 2010;Osínski, Karbowski & Ostaszewski, 2015).…”
Section: Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Yang and Carlsson [21] find that individual decisions are similar to joint decisions in terms of time preferences. Another group of works examine time preferences and social preferences, finding that more patient subjects are likely to share payoffs with other people in social-dilemma situations [3,22,23]. Ambrus et al, and He and Villeval [24,25] demonstrate that a "median" member (who has a median social preference in a group) has a significant influence on group decisions since the highest and the lowest members tend to be attracted to the median.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%