2018
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharing End-of-Life Care Preferences with Family Members: Who Has the Discussion and Who Does Not

Abstract: It is important to understand the differing experiences and attitudes of those who do or do not engage in EOL discussions. Research is needed on healthcare practitioners' use of decision-making tools to help patients discuss their EOL care preferences with family and others, the goal of which is to provide care consistent with patients' goals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Encouraging double awareness means to promote the flexibility of mind between life awareness and death awareness and seems to be a very useful approach in this context. Another relevant part of the motivation-focused approach includes the provision of information, considering that lack of knowledge represents a relevant barrier in engaging in end-of-life discussions [48,49]. While prior studies have used different strategies for older persons (e.g., peer education program on end-of-life planning) and younger persons (e.g., an arts project that brought together hospice users and school pupils) [37], in this study the same interventions seem to work for both, older and younger adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encouraging double awareness means to promote the flexibility of mind between life awareness and death awareness and seems to be a very useful approach in this context. Another relevant part of the motivation-focused approach includes the provision of information, considering that lack of knowledge represents a relevant barrier in engaging in end-of-life discussions [48,49]. While prior studies have used different strategies for older persons (e.g., peer education program on end-of-life planning) and younger persons (e.g., an arts project that brought together hospice users and school pupils) [37], in this study the same interventions seem to work for both, older and younger adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Der Mangel an Wissen über persönliche Entscheidungsspielräume am Lebensende stellt eine relevante Barriere dar [32,33]. Die Befragten wünschen sich mehr Anlaufstellen, die Orientierung und Gesprächsbegleitung bieten.…”
Section: Implikationen Für Die Praxisunclassified
“…However, there is still a lack of research to demonstrate the benefit and outcomes to using such communication aids. Peterson and colleagues 54 used focus groups with 36 older community-dwelling participants to explore differences between those who had engaged in ACP discussions and those who had not. They found several overarching themes that influenced engagement or not, these included, being proactive or passive/reactive; discussions about death being seen as normal or abnormal; family resistance/disconnection.…”
Section: Conversation Prompts For Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive experiences of ACP discussions were where participants felt the professionals were confident in raising and discussing the main issues. Peterson and colleagues 54 argue that research is needed on health care practitioners’ use of tools to help patients discuss their end-of-life care preferences with family and others. Research is also required to measure the outcomes of using conversation prompt cards in facilitating ACP discussions in families affected by dementia.…”
Section: Conversation Prompts For Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%