“…Of them, 67 articles were excluded due to following reasons: 32 reported no outcomes of interest, 18 reported only qualitative data, 6 were deemed to be of unsuitable publication type, 5 had no full-text available, 3 focused on views of populations not of interest, and 3 were published in a language other than English. Initially, 15 articles seemed to meet the inclusion criteria, however, after tabulating their information they were excluded as well: 10 reported HD sharing with recipients that were not of interest, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 4 reported wrong HD type or biospecimen only, 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 and 1 was retracted. 40 This left 116 articles to be included in our qualitative summary, yielding a total of 228,501 participants ( Fig.…”