2015
DOI: 10.1139/cjb-2014-0261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharing of chloroplast haplotypes among red oak species suggests interspecific gene flow between neighboring populations

Abstract: The North American red oak species Quercus rubra L., Quercus ellipsoidalis E. J. Hill, Quercus velutina Lam., and Quercus coccinea Münchh. are morphologically similar and showed very low interspecific differentiation at most nuclear genetic markers in our earlier analyses (<10%). However, a few genetic markers showed interspecific differentiation values (up to 84%) above neutral expectations, a pattern of genomic divergence consistent with models of ecological speciation in the face of gene flow and strong div… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The four species represent a drought tolerance gradient with Q. ellipsoidalis being the most drought tolerant, followed by Q. coccinea and then Q. velutina, while Q. rubra is considered the most mesophilic red oak species [16,38]. Despite morphological and ecophysiological differences [8,16,38,39] between the four oak species, genetic differentiation between them is low at most nuclear genetic markers [7,8,10,25] as well as at chloroplast markers [14]. This is consistent with the tendency for closely related oak species to frequently hybridize with one other [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The four species represent a drought tolerance gradient with Q. ellipsoidalis being the most drought tolerant, followed by Q. coccinea and then Q. velutina, while Q. rubra is considered the most mesophilic red oak species [16,38]. Despite morphological and ecophysiological differences [8,16,38,39] between the four oak species, genetic differentiation between them is low at most nuclear genetic markers [7,8,10,25] as well as at chloroplast markers [14]. This is consistent with the tendency for closely related oak species to frequently hybridize with one other [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is also supported by previous studies and a recent restriction site associated sequencing (RAD-seq) phylogeny of the genus ( [9,[11][12][13]). Genetically intermediate forms were found in contact zones between Q. ellipsoidalis, Q. rubra and Q. velutina, in sympatric stands indicating gene flow among these three species [8,10,14]. High levels of interspecific gene flow were detected especially between Q. ellipsoidalis and Q. velutina.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…a,b), even when they occur in sympatry and gene flow is evident (Hipp et al ., , ; Cavender‐Bares et al ., ; Eaton et al ., ). Numerous studies using nuclear DNA markers – including microsatellites, random amplification of polymorphic DNA markers, or low‐copy nuclear genes – present similar evidence (Craft et al ., ; González‐Rodríguez et al ., , ; Curtu et al ., ; Cavender‐Bares & Pahlich, ; Craft & Ashley, ; Holtken et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ). By contrast, chloroplast DNA, which is maternally inherited (Dumolin et al ., ), typically shows extensive introgression (Whittemore & Schaal, ), and haploptypes are shared across species (Fig.…”
Section: Insights From the History Of The American Oaks For Understanmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…E-mail: ogailing@mtu.edu North American clade comprising c. 195 species (Aldrich et al, 2003;Dodd & Afzal-Rafii, 2004;Peñaloza-Ram ırez et al, 2010;Moran, Willis & Clark, 2012). Sullivan et al, 2013) and sharing of plastid haplotypes (Zhang, Hipp & Gailing, 2015) through some combination of incomplete lineage sorting and interspecific gene flow (Muir & Schl€ otterer, 2005;Lexer, Kremer & Petit, 2006). Sullivan et al, 2013) and sharing of plastid haplotypes (Zhang, Hipp & Gailing, 2015) through some combination of incomplete lineage sorting and interspecific gene flow (Muir & Schl€ otterer, 2005;Lexer, Kremer & Petit, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%