2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-015-1105-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharing spray and wait routing algorithm in opportunistic networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, node X does not make a decision on whether it is the best path to forward the data packet through the Y forwarding node. Typical algorithms include Epidemic, 9 Spray and Wait, 10 and Spray and Focus. 11 Based on the Epidemic algorithm, Chancay-Garcı´a et al 12 considered that the amount of transmitted information is limited by the transmission speed and contact time and proposed an epidemic extension protocol called Xpread.…”
Section: Routing Algorithm Based On Opportunistic Forwardingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, node X does not make a decision on whether it is the best path to forward the data packet through the Y forwarding node. Typical algorithms include Epidemic, 9 Spray and Wait, 10 and Spray and Focus. 11 Based on the Epidemic algorithm, Chancay-Garcı´a et al 12 considered that the amount of transmitted information is limited by the transmission speed and contact time and proposed an epidemic extension protocol called Xpread.…”
Section: Routing Algorithm Based On Opportunistic Forwardingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to address the overhead problem in Epidemic routing, the Prophet algorithm and the Spray and Wait algorithm were proposed. In these algorithms, the total number of message copies is limited to a certain range, or message forwarding is carried out when a certain condition is met.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, we have compared our Softwarecast proposal with a multi-copy version of Softwarecast (MC-Softwarecast in the figures). In this case, messages are not being routed following single-copy routing algorithm but a multi-copy one similar to Spray and Wait [13] in binary mode: messages define an initial number of copies (L = 2) and, when being forwarded to other nodes, half of their Softwarecast messages are forwarded to the contacted node (one copy since L = 2). These multi-copy Softwarecast messages, when being forwarded, follow a strategy similar to the Marriage Problem [16] explained in Section 4 with v * 1 = 40/e = 14.7: messages are not considered for delivery before being forwarded to 15 nodes and after the 15th contacted node the message is delivered to the first node whose retrieved value is bigger than all of the precedents.…”
Section: Comparing To Traditional Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%