2022
DOI: 10.1190/int-2022-0027.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp change of the channel bar pattern within the river delta: Insights from modern Ganjiang River delta in Jiangxi province, China

Abstract: Channel bars (mid-channel bars or point bars) in river-deltas offer building materials, habitats, and farmlands, and threaten water transportation, as well as, could become targets in hydrocarbon reservoirs. Researchers focus on the channel bar pattern in rivers, whereas ignoring the channel bar pattern in distributary channels. We propose a sharp change of the channel bar pattern from the river to the delta. The integration of remote map analysis, fieldwork, and a flume experiment resulted in a quantified sha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The internal structure of the mouth bars consists of sets of wavy reflections marking traces of bedforms. The sedimentary structure resembles the mouth bars studied by Lee et al (2007) in the Cretaceous Wall Creek sandstone delta (Wyoming, USA) and Xu et al (2022) in the Ganjiang delta (China). GPR section 18 (Figure 6) is similar to the architecture of a mouth bar delta shown in Winsemann et al (Winsemann et al, 2018; see Figure 9a,c in there).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The internal structure of the mouth bars consists of sets of wavy reflections marking traces of bedforms. The sedimentary structure resembles the mouth bars studied by Lee et al (2007) in the Cretaceous Wall Creek sandstone delta (Wyoming, USA) and Xu et al (2022) in the Ganjiang delta (China). GPR section 18 (Figure 6) is similar to the architecture of a mouth bar delta shown in Winsemann et al (Winsemann et al, 2018; see Figure 9a,c in there).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The difference in dip observed between Fsa and Fsb likely reflects the position of the deposits within the 3D deltaic bar. The steeper angles observed (up to ∼35°) are preferentially observed closer to the primary direction of delta progradation, while lower dips indicate a deposition occurring on the lateral banks of a delta bar, off‐axis from the primary direction of delta progradation (e.g., Ori & Roveri, 1987; van Yperen et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2016). This peculiar 3D architecture is evidenced here at Kodiak within Unit 1 (Figure 3c) as we observe lower dip values associated with the occurrence of Fsb in section #4 compared to Fsa in section #2.…”
Section: Stratigraphic Architecture and Sedimentary Facies Of The Kod...mentioning
confidence: 99%