2019
DOI: 10.1090/proc/14645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp gradient estimates for a heat equation in Riemannian manifolds

Abstract: In this paper, we prove sharp gradient estimates for a positive solution to the heat equation u t = ∆u + au log u in complete noncompact Riemannian manifolds. As its application, we show that if u is a positive solution of the equation u t = ∆u and log u is of sublinear growth in both spatial and time directions then u must be constant. This gradient estimate is sharp since it is well-known that u(x, t) = e x+t satisfying u t = ∆u. We also emphasize that our results are better than those given by Jiang ([Jia16… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the f -heat equation, we have another useful inequality, which was established in [3] for the manifold case.…”
Section: Lemma 22 (Seementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the f -heat equation, we have another useful inequality, which was established in [3] for the manifold case.…”
Section: Lemma 22 (Seementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, they proved that a gradient estimate of Brighton type is valid under only a lower bound of Ric f . Second, we prove elliptic gradient estimates for the f -heat equation with Dirichlet boundary condition on (M, g, e −f dv) by improving the argument of [3], which seems to be new even for manifolds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As in [5], we have the following Bochner type formula, which holds on smooth metric measure spaces without any assumption on f . Lemma 2.4.…”
Section: ∂M) Obviouslymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, we need an important Bochner type formula for equation (1.1) in the proof of our result, which was similarly discussed in [5]. Let 0 < u ≤ B for some positive constant B be a solution to (1.1) in Q R,T (∂M).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%