2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp interface Cartesian grid method II: A technique for simulating droplet interactions with surfaces of arbitrary shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
113
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical methods using an implicit representation of the interface such as Volume-OfFluid (vof) [1,2,3,4] or Levelset (ls) [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] can robustly and efficiently represent evolving, topologically complex interfaces. The accurate representation of surface tension within these methods is typically more delicate than for schemes using an explicit representation of the interface [14,15,16,17] and care must be taken to avoid any imbalance between discrete surface tension and pressure gradient terms [18,19,15,20,21,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methods using an implicit representation of the interface such as Volume-OfFluid (vof) [1,2,3,4] or Levelset (ls) [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] can robustly and efficiently represent evolving, topologically complex interfaces. The accurate representation of surface tension within these methods is typically more delicate than for schemes using an explicit representation of the interface [14,15,16,17] and care must be taken to avoid any imbalance between discrete surface tension and pressure gradient terms [18,19,15,20,21,22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the transport of the interface, we give here some examples showing that almost all the classical methods are concerned: Boundary Integral methods [1][2][3], adaptive grid methods [4,5], Level-Set methods [6,7], Volume of Fluid methods [8][9][10], Front Tracking Methods [11,12] and coupled Level set and Volume-of-Fluid (CLSVOF) methods [13]. Different methods have also been developed for the modeling of moving contact lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest situation is then to impose a constant angle corresponding to the static angle, i.e. h W ¼ h S [8,11,7,6,9]. When a no-slip condition is imposed on the wall, the stress generated by a contact line moving at velocity U cl , can be estimated as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical algorithms for calculating surface tension have been presented from the perspective of front tracking algorithms [14,26,25,28,16], Volume-of-Fluid algorithms [3,7,1,18,8], level set methods [24,12,13], and various hybrid methods [23,20,6]. The ability to accurately calculate surface tension can be important for modeling the impact of drops on surfaces, contact line dynamics, bubble motion, and the break-up of liquid jets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%