2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-013-0672-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp local estimates for the Szegö–Weinberger profile in Riemannian manifolds

Abstract: We study the local Szegö-Weinberger profile in a geodesic ball Bg(y0, r0) centered at a point y0 in a Riemannian manifold (M, g). This profile is obtained by maximizing the first nontrivial Neumann eigenvalue µ2 of the Laplace-Beltrami Operator ∆g on M among subdomains of Bg(y0, r0) with fixed volume. We derive a sharp asymptotic bounds of this profile in terms of the scalar curvature of M at y0. As a corollary, we deduce a local comparison principle depending only on the scalar curvature. Our study is related… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next we restrict our attention to cylindrical manifolds of the type M := R k × N , where (N , g N ) is a closed connected manifold and the product metric g = g eucl ⊗ g N is considered on M . For the problem of maximizing µ 2 (Ω) among domains of fixed volume v, one may expect a different shape of maximizers depending on the size of v. If v > 0 is small, the results in [7] on the corresponding asymptotic profile expansion suggest that maximizing domains are perturbations of small geodesic ellipsoids in M , whereas for large v the domains…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next we restrict our attention to cylindrical manifolds of the type M := R k × N , where (N , g N ) is a closed connected manifold and the product metric g = g eucl ⊗ g N is considered on M . For the problem of maximizing µ 2 (Ω) among domains of fixed volume v, one may expect a different shape of maximizers depending on the size of v. If v > 0 is small, the results in [7] on the corresponding asymptotic profile expansion suggest that maximizing domains are perturbations of small geodesic ellipsoids in M , whereas for large v the domains…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%