2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12220-020-00430-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp Reverse Hölder Inequality for $$C_p$$ Weights and Applications

Abstract: We prove an appropriate sharp quantitative reverse Hölder inequality for the C p class of weights from which we obtain as a limiting case the sharp reverse Hölder inequality for the A ∞ class of weights [13, 14]. We use this result to provide a quantitative weighted norm inequality between Calderón-Zygmund operators and the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function, precisely T f L p (w) T,n,p,q [w] Cq (1 + log + [w] Cq) M f L p (w) , for w ∈ C q and q > p > 1, quantifying Sawyer's theorem [26].

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lerner [16] fully characterized the weak type version of (1.1). Sawyer's result has been extended to the full range in [6] and also quantitative estimates in terms of a suitable constant and further operators, such as rough singular integrals, have been explored in [4, 5].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lerner [16] fully characterized the weak type version of (1.1). Sawyer's result has been extended to the full range in [6] and also quantitative estimates in terms of a suitable constant and further operators, such as rough singular integrals, have been explored in [4, 5].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years several advances have been made, for instance the extension in [5] to the full range 0 < p < ∞ and other operators relying upon [45,22] and sparse domination techniques, the characterization of the good weights for the weak type counterpart of (2.5) in [25], and the quantitative results introduced in [3] and further explored in [4].…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%