2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00020-013-2116-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sharp Weak Type Inequality for Fractional Integral Operators Associated with d-Dimensional Walsh–Fourier Series

Abstract: Abstract. Suppose that d ≥ 1 is an integer, α ∈ (0, d) is a fixed parameter and let Iα be the fractional integral operator associated with d-dimensional Walsh-Fourier series on [0, 1)d . The paper contains the proof of the sharp weak-type estimateThe proof rests on Bellman-function-type method: the above estimate is deduced from the existence of a certain family of special functions.Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). Primary 42B25, 42B30; Secondary 42B35.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proofs in [17], [11], as well as in the current paper rely on Bellman functions adapted to trees. Similar nested structures have also been used in Bellmanfunction contexts by Melas [6] and Melas, Nikolidakis, and Stavropoulos [9]; see also the works of Bañuelos and Osȩkowski [1] and Osȩkowski [12]. The important distinction is that the trees used by those authors were homogeneous, meaning every element of the tree had the same number of offspring, all of the same measure.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The proofs in [17], [11], as well as in the current paper rely on Bellman functions adapted to trees. Similar nested structures have also been used in Bellmanfunction contexts by Melas [6] and Melas, Nikolidakis, and Stavropoulos [9]; see also the works of Bañuelos and Osȩkowski [1] and Osȩkowski [12]. The important distinction is that the trees used by those authors were homogeneous, meaning every element of the tree had the same number of offspring, all of the same measure.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…martingales for which only one martingale difference ∆F n is non-zero) that without the regularity assumption the operator I α may not be continuous as an L p → L q operator (see Remark 2 below). On the other hand, the papers [3] and [10] provide results about the sharp constants in weak-type inequalities for operators similar to I α on uniform filtrations (i.e. each atom in A(F n ) is split into m atoms of equal probability in A(F n+1 ); here m is independent of w and n); the corresponding constants appear to be uniformly bounded with respect to m. This hints there must be a reasonable (i.e.…”
Section: Martingale Fractional Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bellman function arising in our reasonings seems to be interesting in itself (though we will not find the sharp Bellman function, only provide a supersolution in Theorem 3.1). Very little is known about Bellman functions related to fractional operators, however, see [2] and [20] for two sharp supersolutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%