Abstract:We prove that the range of exponents in the general L 2 Fourier restriction theorem due to Mockenhaupt, Mitsis, Bak, and Seeger is sharp for a large class of measures on R d . This extends to higher dimensions the sharpness result of Hambrook and Laba.
“…We conclude referring the reader to the survey [10] for an overview on the restriction problem for fractal measures. We just mention here the results on the restriction for general measures due to Mockenhaupt [13], Mitsis [12] and Bak-Seeger [3], and the proof of sharpness of the previous results by Hambrook-Laba [9].…”
We show that if a measure of dimension s on R d admits (p, q) Fourier restriction for some endpoint exponents allowed by its dimension, namely q = s d p for some p > 1, then it is either absolutely continuous or 1-purely unrectifiable.
“…We conclude referring the reader to the survey [10] for an overview on the restriction problem for fractal measures. We just mention here the results on the restriction for general measures due to Mockenhaupt [13], Mitsis [12] and Bak-Seeger [3], and the proof of sharpness of the previous results by Hambrook-Laba [9].…”
We show that if a measure of dimension s on R d admits (p, q) Fourier restriction for some endpoint exponents allowed by its dimension, namely q = s d p for some p > 1, then it is either absolutely continuous or 1-purely unrectifiable.
“…By modifying the construction of Hambrook and Laba [6], Chen [4] proved that the range is sharp for any 0 < α ≤ β < 1. For n ≥ 2, Hambrook and Laba [7] proved that the range of q is sharp when n−1 < β ≤ α < n. We summarise the known results in the following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Thus the measure µ satisfies the conditions (6), (7) of Theorem 1.4. Let f = 1 A , then the estimate (17) implies that…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Theorem 1.4. Let 0 < β < α < n. Then there exists a probability measure µ on F n such that µ satisfies (6), (7), and if q < q n,α,β then there is τ = τ n,α,β,q > 0 such that R * (2 → q) |F| τ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 1.5. Let 0 < α < n. Then for any 0 < q < q n,α,α there exists a probability measure µ on F n such that µ satisfies (6), (7), and R * (2 → q) |F| τ for some τ = τ n,α,q > 0.…”
We study restriction problem in vector spaces over finite fields. We obtain finite field analogue of Mockenhaupt-Mitsis-Bak-Seenger restriction theorem, and we show that the range of the exponentials is sharp.
We use a deterministic construction to prove the optimality of the exponent in the Mockenhaupt-Mitsis-Bak-Seeger Fourier restriction theorem for dimension $$d=1$$
d
=
1
and parameter range $$0 < a,b \le d$$
0
<
a
,
b
≤
d
and $$b\le 2a$$
b
≤
2
a
. Previous constructions by Hambrook and Łaba [15] and Chen [5] required randomness and only covered the range $$0 < b \le a \le d=1$$
0
<
b
≤
a
≤
d
=
1
. We also resolve a question of Seeger [29] about the Fourier restriction inequality on the sets of well-approximable numbers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.