2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SHC Task 48 B2 – Three GOOD Practice Examples of Solar Heat Driven Desiccant Evaporative Cooling Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For evacuated tube collectors (ETC), values around 55-60% have been consistently obtained [22,23], with peaks up to 78% [24]. In the case of flat plate collectors, there are cases with relatively high efficiencies, around 50-65% [25][26][27], and others with low reported values around 20-30% [28,29]. Considering all of the above, it was decided to use thermal efficiencies in the range of 55-65% for the purpose of the assessment.…”
Section: Solar Cooling Output (Scool Out ) and Boundary Conditions Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For evacuated tube collectors (ETC), values around 55-60% have been consistently obtained [22,23], with peaks up to 78% [24]. In the case of flat plate collectors, there are cases with relatively high efficiencies, around 50-65% [25][26][27], and others with low reported values around 20-30% [28,29]. Considering all of the above, it was decided to use thermal efficiencies in the range of 55-65% for the purpose of the assessment.…”
Section: Solar Cooling Output (Scool Out ) and Boundary Conditions Fomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values come mostly from several monitoring campaigns carried out over the last 20 years on demonstration projects throughout Europe. Thus, solar driven DEC pilot experiences have been designed and evaluated in Germany (ClimaSol, 2002;Henning et al, 2001;SOLAIR, 2009), Austria (ClimaSol, 2002Selke et al, 2016;SOLAIR, 2009), Spain (Eicker et al, 2010;SOLAIR, 2009), Portugal (ClimaSol, 2002 and Greece (SOLAIR, 2009); with cooling capacities from 18 kW to 75 kW and thermal COP values ranging from 0.43 to 0.86. Additionally, the potential to reach higher COP values under optimised system configurations has been simulated and experimentally tested.…”
Section: General Reported Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For evacuated tube collectors (ETC), values around 55-60% have been consistently obtained (Crofoot & Harrison, 2012;Reda et al, 2016), with peaks up to 78% (Reda et al, 2017). In the case of flat plate collectors, there are cases with relative high efficiencies, around 50-65% (Abdel-Salam et al, 2014;Enteria & Mizutani, 2011;Henning et al, 2001), and others with low reported values circling 20-30% (Chang et al, 2009;Selke et al, 2016). Considering all of the above, it was decided to use thermal efficiencies in the range of 55-65% for the purpose of the assessment.…”
Section: Glazing Typementioning
confidence: 99%